Revolutionizing Banking Integrating Non-Fungible Tokens for Secure Financial Transactions

Abstract

Blockchain technology is increasingly recognized for its ability to provide robust security in digital systems, offering transparent, immutable, and decentralized solutions. Within the current blockchain framework, Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) are utilized primarily for representing unique digital assets in transactions. However, NFTs face limitations in financial contexts, particularly as they are unsuitable for use as collateral. This is due to their nonfungible nature, which makes them difficult to value consistently and exchange uniformly compared to traditional assets. To overcome these challenges, the proposed system aims to innovate by integrating NFTs into the banking sector. This system enhances the utility of NFTs by employing them in secure financial transactions, leveraging the Proof of Stake (PoS) algorithm to record each transaction on the blockchain. PoS provides a more energy-efficient and scalable solution compared to Proof of Work (PoW), making it well-suited for the high demands of financial systems. By implementing NFTs within this framework, the proposed system not only secures transactions but also expands the potential applications of NFTs beyond digital collectibles. This integration could revolutionize the way digital assets are handled in banking, offering new opportunities for financial innovation and asset management.

Introduction

1. Overview

The integration of Non-Fungible Token (NFT) trading within traditional banking systems aims to democratize access to digital assets by allowing customers to buy, sell, and hold NFTs securely through banks. This initiative merges blockchain technology with regulated finance, addressing concerns related to accessibility, security, and trust, especially for users unfamiliar with crypto platforms.

2. Key Features and Goals

• Democratization of NFTs: Making NFTs accessible to the general public via banks, bypassing complex crypto marketplaces.

• Enhanced Security: Banks’ infrastructure adds layers of regulatory compliance, data protection, and transaction safety.

• Customer Education: Providing resources to educate users about NFT ownership, risks, and trading.

• Financial Innovation: Enabling tokenization of real-world assets like real estate, intellectual property, and stocks.

3. Literature Review Highlights

• NFT Marketplaces [1]: Discusses NFT platforms, smart contracts, tokenization, and digital content trade.

• Suspicious NFT Trading [2]: Identifies irregularities in trading behavior and calls for regulatory frameworks.

• Anonymous NFT Trading [3]: Proposes privacy-preserving mechanisms to protect users’ identities and transactions.

• TradeNFT Marketplace [4]: Offers fully decentralized NFT storage using Internet Computer Platform for security and decentralization.

• NFTs in Cultural Heritage [5]: Explores how blockchain helps preserve and manage cultural assets in the GLAM sector.

• Emoji Art NFTs from Conversations [6]: Uses AI to create NFT-backed emoji art, enhancing personalization in the metaverse.

4. Proposed System in Banking

A next-gen banking platform is proposed that supports secure NFT-based transactions. Key points:

• Uses Proof of Stake (PoS) for efficient and eco-friendly transaction validation.

• Enables NFT-backed loans, fractional ownership, and tokenized financial products (e.g., insurance, bonds).

• Redefines NFTs as financial instruments, not just collectibles.

5. System Architecture

Key modules:

• NFT Management Module: Interfaces between NFT storage and banking services.

• Collateralization Engine: Enables NFT-backed lending or interest generation.

• Financial Products Module: Supports tokenization of financial contracts.

• Integration Layer: Connects with merchants via APIs.

• Compliance and Security Layer: Ensures regulatory adherence and privacy.

• User Interface: Simplifies customer interaction with NFTs in banking.

6. Implementation Modules

• Blockchain Integration Module: Stores complete NFT data (metadata + images) securely on-chain.

• Decentralized Storage Module: Eliminates dependence on third-party cloud storage.

• Smart Contract Execution Module: Manages automated, tamper-proof trading processes.

• Security & Privacy Module: Applies cryptographic measures to protect user data and payments.

7. Performance Evaluation Metrics

• Trading Volume: Measures market activity and user engagement.

• Market Capitalization: Estimates total value of NFTs in circulation.

• User Activity: Tracks engagement levels and user retention.

• Price Performance: Analyzes NFT price trends over time.

• Transaction Speed: Assesses blockchain responsiveness.

• Gas Costs: Evaluates transaction fee efficiency.

• Liquidity: Reflects how easily NFTs can be bought/sold without price disruption.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the proposed system aims to transform the banking sector by integrating Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) into financial transactions, significantly expanding their utility beyond mere digital collectibles. By harnessing the capabilities of blockchain technology and utilizing the energy-efficient Proof of Stake (PoS) algorithm, this system effectively addresses the inherent challenges associated with NFTs, particularly their non-fungible nature that complicates consistent valuation and uniform exchange as collateral. This innovative integration enables the secure use of NFTs across various financial contexts, creating new avenues for asset management and innovation. As the financial landscape continues to evolve, the potential to leverage NFTs as collateral could fundamentally alter the handling of digital assets in banking, resulting in enhanced liquidity and broader financial services. Ultimately, this system not only improves transaction security and efficiency but also positions NFTs as a crucial element in the future of finance, reshaping perceptions and applications of digital assets within traditional financial frameworks. Future work could explore the development of standardized valuation methods for NFTs to facilitate their use as collateral in diverse financial products. Additionally, research could focus on enhancing regulatory frameworks to ensure compliance and security in NFT transactions within the banking sector.

References

[1] A. K. Kar and A. K. Kushwaha, ‘‘Facilitators and barriers of artificial intelligence adoption in business—Insights from opinions using big data analytics,’’ Inf. Syst. Frontiers, pp. 1–24, Nov. 2021. [2] E. Papagiannidis, I. M. Enholm, C. Dremel, P. Mikalef, and J. Krogstie, ‘‘Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes,’’ Inf. Syst. Frontiers, pp. 1–19, Apr. 2022. [3] M. Cubric, ‘‘Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study,’’ Technol. Soc., vol. 62, Aug. 2020, Art. no. 101257. [4] F. Wang and A. Preininger, ‘‘AI in health: State of the art, challenges, and future directions,’’ Yearbook Med. Informat., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–26, Aug. 2019. [5] L. Cao, ‘‘AI in finance: Challenges, techniques, and opportunities,’’ ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1–38, Apr. 2023. [6] R. Abduljabbar, H. Dia, S. Liyanage, and S. A. Bagloee, ‘‘Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: An overview,’’ Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 189, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071- 1050/11/1/189 [7] C. Rikap and B.-. AA Lundvall, ‘‘Amazon and Microsoft: Convergence and the emerging AI technology trajectory,’’ in The Digital Innovation Race. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021, pp. 91–119. [8] Research. Accessed: Sep. 23, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ai. google/research [9] W. Entriken, D. Shirley, J. Evans, and N. Sachs. (Jan. 2018). Eip721: Non-Fungible Token Standard. [Online]. Available: https://eips. ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721 [10] Q. Wang, R. Li, Q. Wang, and S. Chen, ‘‘Non-fungible token(NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges,’’ 2021, arXiv:2105.07447. [11] E. Parliament. (May 2016). General Data Protection Regulation Document 02016r0679-20160504. [12] K. Sarpatwar, R. Vaculin, H. Min, G. Su, T. Heath, G. Ganapavarapu, and D. Dillenberger, ‘‘Towards enabling trusted artificial intelligence via blockchain,’’ in Policy-Based Autonomic Data Governance. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 137–153. [13] P. Lüthi, T. Gagnaux, and M. Gygli, Distributed Ledger for Provenance Tracking of Artificial Intelligence Assets. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, pp. 411–426, doi: 10.1007/978-3-03042504-3_26. [14] K. Sarpatwar, V. S. Ganapavarapu, K. Shanmugam, A. Rahman, and R. Vaculin, ‘‘Blockchain enabled AI marketplace: The price you pay for trust,’’ in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshops (CVPRW), Jun. 2019, pp. 2857–2866. [15] N. Six, A. Perrichon-Chrétien, and N. Herbaut, ‘‘Saiaas: A blockchainbased solution for secure artificial intelligence as-aservice,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Deep Learn., Big Data Blockchain (Deep-BDB), I. Awan, S. Benbernou, M. Younas, and M. Aleksy, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2021, pp. 67–74. [16] L. D. Nguyen, S. R. Pandey, S. Beatriz, A. Broering, and P. Popovski, ‘‘A marketplace for trading AI models based on blockchain and incentives for IoT data,’’ 2021, arXiv:2112.02870. [17] L. Lyu, Y. Li, K. Nandakumar, J. Yu, and X. Ma, ‘‘How to democratise and protect AI: Fair and differentially private decentralised deep learning,’’ IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1003–1017, Mar./Apr. 2020. [18] S. A. Khowaja, K. Dev, N. M. F. Qureshi, P. Khuwaja, and L. Foschini, ‘‘Toward industrial private AI: A two-tier framework for data and model security,’’ IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 76–83, Apr. 2022. [19] V. Mehri and K. Tutschku, ‘‘Flexible privacy and high trust in the next generation internet: The use case of a cloud-based marketplace for AI,’’ in Proc. SNCNW-Swedish Nat. Comput. Netw. Workshop, Halmstad, Sweden: Halmstad Univ., 2017, pp. 90–148. [20] Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, ‘‘Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey,’’ Int. J. Web Grid Services, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 352–375, 2018. [21] E. Papagiannidis, I. M. Enholm, C. Dremel, P. Mikalef, and J. Krogstie, ‘‘Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes,’’ Inf. Syst. Frontiers, pp. 1– 19, Apr. 2022. [22] M. Cubric, ‘‘Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study,’’ Technol. Soc., vol. 62, Aug. 2020, Art. no. 101257. [23] L. Cao, ‘‘AI in finance: Challenges, techniques, and opportunities,’’ ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1– 38, Apr. 2023. [24] R. Abduljabbar, H. Dia, S. Liyanage, and S. A. Bagloee, ‘‘Applications of artificial intelligence in transport: An overview,’’ Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 189, 2019. [25] S. M. H. Bamakan, N. Nezhadsistani, O. Bodaghi, and Q. Qu, ‘‘Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges,’’ Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1– 13, 2022.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Mr. T. RajanBabu , Dr. R. G. Suresh Kumar, Mr. P. Harish, Mr. N. Manikandan, Mr. S. Vignesh, Mr. S. Saravanavel . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.