Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategies in EPC Construction Site

Abstract

: Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects are the backbone of infrastructure development in India and globally.Their turnkey nature streamlines delivery but also centralizes risk responsibility under a single contractor, creating multiple points of failure across the engineering, procurement, and construction phases.From design errors and vendor issues to safety lapses and labor disruptions, these risks have the potential to derail timelines, escalate costs, and compromise safety. Despite the availability of international frameworks such as ISO 31000 and PMBOK, the application of structured risk management in Indian EPC firms remains inconsistent and often reactive.This study investigates critical risk categories in EPC projects and evaluates real-world mitigation strategies based on quantitative and qualitative data. A mixed-methods research design was adopted, involving 42 professional survey responses and five project case studies spanning sectors such as power transmission, metro depot infrastructure, and refinery expansion. Tools like Probability-Impact matrices, Composite Risk Index (CRI), and risk heat maps were employed to identify and rank high-risk events. Findings show that regulatory approval delays, vendor underperformance, and construction site safety violations are the top contributors to project inefficiencies.A five-stage Risk Management Framework (RMF) was developed and retrospectively applied to a metro depot case, demonstrating improvements in procurement planning, coordination, and reduction in rework. The study concludes with clear, actionable recommendations for institutionalizing risk management in EPC projects through digital tools, standardized reviews, and stakeholder accountability. These outcomes aim to empower EPC firms to enhance predictability, reduce losses, and embed a risk-aware culture in their operations.

Introduction

Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects streamline infrastructure delivery by integrating multiple disciplines under a single contract, improving decision-making and accountability. However, this integration also creates complex risks across project phases: engineering risks include design errors and regulatory delays; procurement faces vendor delays and price fluctuations; construction deals with safety incidents and labor shortages. Unmanaged risks lead to delays, cost overruns, and safety issues.

In India, risk management in EPC projects is often treated as a compliance formality rather than a proactive process. While global standards like ISO 31000 and PMBOK exist, mid-tier EPC firms frequently lack formal frameworks or underuse tools like risk registers and BIM.

The study uses a mixed-methods approach with data from 42 EPC professionals, interviews, project documentation, and literature to develop a tailored risk mitigation framework for Indian EPC projects. Analysis shows that risks vary by project phase, with regulatory approval delays, vendor failures, safety incidents, design gaps, and labor shortages ranking highest in risk impact.

Case studies highlight real problems like design clashes and welding defects, demonstrating that early adoption of BIM and quality assurance can reduce rework and costs. Mitigation efforts are strongest during construction (e.g., safety drills), but formal risk documentation and systematic tracking remain underutilized across phases.

The findings emphasize the need for phase-specific risk management practices and improved adoption of structured tools and training to better handle EPC project risks in India.

Conclusion

This research provides a comprehensive examination of the risks commonly encountered in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) projects and the techniques currently employed to mitigate them.[11]Through a methodical analysis of quantitative survey data from 42 professionals and five real-life project case studies, the study identifies that the most critical and recurring risks span across three primary domains: engineering coordination gaps and regulatory delays,[12] procurement bottlenecks such as vendor underperformance and material price escalation, and construction phase hazards such as labor shortages and safety incidents.[13]The Composite Risk Index (CRI) ranking revealed that engineering-related risks were the most dominant, with regulatory approval delays[14] (CRI 78.5)anddesign coordination gaps (CRI 66.3) being particularly disruptive to project schedules.[15] Procurement-related risks like vendor failure (CRI 74.2) and construction-phase issues like on-site safety incidents (CRI 70.4)andlabor shortages (CRI 64.5) were also found to significantly impact[16] timelines and budgets. Despite being aware of these risks, many EPC firms still rely heavily on informal practices such as undocumented verbal coordination,[17]incomplete risk registers, or last-minute firefighting. The case studies further validate that many of these risks could have been avoided or minimized[18] through early-stage interventions and structured controls. For example, Project P-03 faced major rework costs due to a design clash between HVAC and structural elements,[19]which could have been avoided with BIM usage. Similarly, Project P-05 saw a dramatic reduction in welding-related NCRs after the introduction of third-party quality auditshighlighting the direct value of structured QA processes.[20] While some positive practices such astoolbox talks (88% usage in construction)anddesign reviews (71% in engineering) are widely adopted, the overall maturity of risk culture remains low. Only 52% of respondents reported using risk registers consistently, and digital integration such as BIM or ERP-based dashboards was largely absent.[21] The study recommends that EPC organizations adopt a structured and formalized risk management framework that spans all project phasescovering risk planning, identification, mitigation, monitoring, and communication.[22] This framework should align with standards such as ISO 31000 and PMBOK but be tailored to fit the operational[23] context of Indian EPC firms. The use of digital tools like BIM for design coordination and ERP systems for procurement and risk tracking should be encouraged[24] to reduce rework and enhance visibility. Maintaining centralized and regularly updated risk registers will help institutions document lessons learned and improve decision-making in future projects.[25] In procurement, risk can be mitigated by enforcing vendor prequalification, adopting multi-sourcing strategies,[26] and incorporating performance-based contract clauses. Construction risks, particularly those related to safety and labor, should be addressed through continuous HSE training, toolbox talks, and independent safety audits.[27] Capacity building through professional training and certification in risk management is essential to strengthen in-house expertise.[28] Additionally, public-sector EPC firms should actively engage with regulatory authorities to streamline approvals and minimize external delays.[29] Collectively, these measures aim to move risk management from a reactive process to a proactive, integrated function within EPC project execution.[30]

References

[1] Huang, J., Fu, X., Chen, X., & Wen, X. (2024). Supply Chain Management for the Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Model: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 16(22), 9748. [2] introduce complex and multilayered risks. EPC contractors assume full responsibility for design, procurement, construction, and commissioning, making them vulnerable to any deviation in scope, schedule, or cost [3] Baxendale, T., & Jones, O. (2000). Construction design and management safety regulations in practice—progress on implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 33-40. [4] Osoro, A. (2013). Analysis of the problems of vendor payment in relation to procurement procedures: a case study of the Ministry of Environment (Doctoral dissertation). [5] Ekwuno, A. O. (2022). Research To Study The Damage Caused To The Construction Projects Due To The Lack Of Workers On Site. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 12(12), 361-382. [6] Ansah, R. H., Sorooshian, S., Mustafa, S. B., & Oludapo, O. S. (2017). Constructions project management risks’ framework. Calitatea, 18(158), 90. [7] Greiman, V. A. (2013). Megaproject management: Lessons on risk and project management from the Big Dig. John Wiley & Sons. [8] Vargas, D. B., & Campos, L. M. D. S. (2022). Risk Management: A parallel between ISO 31000 (2018) and the PMBOK Guide (2017). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Istanbul, Turkey, IEOM Society International, PAG (pp. 1474-14). [9] Elnokaly, A., & Dogonyaro, I. (2024). Framework to assess connection of risk factors and management strategies in Building Information Modeling. Academia Engineering, 1(4). [10] Huang, J., & Li, S. M. (2024). Data-Driven Analysis of Supply Chain Integration’s Impact on Procurement Performance in International EPC Projects. Sustainability, 16(23), 10729. [11] Kabirifar, K., & Mojtahedi, M. (2019). The impact of engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) phases on project performance: a case of large-scale residential construction project. Buildings, 9(1), 15. [12] Ragab, M. (2024). Enhancing Resilience in Construction Procurement: Strategies and Technologies for Mitigating Risks and Improving Performance. [13] Zhang, Y., Mao, P., Li, H., Xu, Y., You, D., Liu, H., ... & Yuan, J. (2020). Assessing the safety risks of civil engineering laboratories based on lab criticity index: a case study in Jiangsu province. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(17), 6244. [14] Lacey, T. J. (1975). The Maintenance of Internal Security in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Jamaica, 1960-70, in the Context of the Regional Security Arrangements. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom). [15] Farooq, A. R. (2025). Construction Accident Factors That Can Be Addressed During the Design Phase (Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University). [16] Farooq, A. R. (2025). Construction Accident Factors That Can Be Addressed During the Design Phase (Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Metropolitan University). [17] Shen, W., Choi, B., Lee, S., Tang, W., & Haas, C. T. (2018). How to improve interface management behaviors in EPC projects: Roles of formal practices and social norms. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(6), 04018032. [18] Collier, Z. A., & Lambert, J. H. (2019). Principles and methods of model validation for model risk reduction. Environment systems and decisions, 39(2), 146-153. [19] Meshksar, S. (2012). Cost and time impacts of reworks in building a reinforced concrete structure (Doctoral dissertation, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)). [20] Kluse, C. (2013). Third-party Quality Management System audits: perceptions, limitations, and recommended improvements. Quality Issues and Insights in the 21st Century, 2(1), 28-45. [21] AlMarri, M., Al-Ali, M., Alzarooni, M., AlTeneiji, A., Al-Ali, K., & Bahroun, Z. (2025). Enterprise resource planning systems for health, safety, and environment management: Analyzing critical success factors. Sustainability, 17(7), 2947. [22] Greenberg, S., Gauvreau, L., Hnottavange-Telleen, K., Finley, R., & Marsteller, S. (2011). Meeting CCS communication challenges head-on: Integrating communications, planning, risk assessment, and project management. Energy Procedia, 4, 6188-6193. [23] Hutchins, G. (2018). ISO 31000: 2018 enterprise risk management. Greg Hutchins. [24] Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A., & Jones, S. W. (2017). A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety science, 97, 88-98. [25] Miller, R., & Lessard, D. R. (2001). The strategic management of large engineering projects: Shaping institutions, risks, and governance. MIT press. [26] Chowdhury, A. R. (2025). A systematic review of risk-based procurement strategies in retail supply chains: Sourcing flexibility and vendor disruption management. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 1(01), 466-505. [27] Hassel, A. (2016). Implementation of HSE Management Practices at Construction Sites in Developing Countries (Master\'s thesis, NTNU). [28] Olonilua, O., & Aliu, J. O. (2025). Assessing Workforce Training Strategies in Critical Infrastructure: Insights and Recommendations. [29] Josefsen, A. X. (2020). EU Public Procurement: Contractual Implementation and Viability of EPC Contracts for Provisions on Marine and Offshore Infrastructures for the Public Sector. [30] Pratap Chandran, S., & K. Purayil, P. (2020, November). Project Execution Success in an Epcm Environment by Ensuring Project Management & Project Controls Rigor During Pre Construction Phases. In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (p. D011S024R001). SPE.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Yogesh Singh, Nishant Singh Kushwah. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.