The vulnerability of multistorey buildings to seismic events has been a significant concern for structural engineers, especially in countries like India, which are seismically active. Different seismic zones require different structural considerations to ensure safety and serviceability. This paper presents a comprehensive review of seismic analysis of multistorey buildings for various seismic zones as per IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 guidelines. The study examines various structural configurations, analysis methods (linear static, linear dynamic, nonlinear dynamic), and performance parameters like base shear, storey drift, displacement, and fundamental time period. This paper highlights the importance of seismic zone-specific design for achieving efficient and economical structures while ensuring adequate seismic performance.
Introduction
1. Overview
Earthquakes are natural events that can severely damage buildings, particularly high-rise structures if they are not properly designed. India is divided into four seismic zones (II to V) based on earthquake risk, as defined by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Seismic analysis is essential to ensure buildings have the strength, flexibility, and ductility to withstand these forces.
2. Seismic Zones of India
Zone II: Low-risk (MM Intensity ≤ 6)
Zone III: Moderate-risk (Intensity 7)
Zone IV: Severe-risk (Intensity 8)
Zone V: Very severe-risk (Intensity ≥ 9)
Each zone covers different parts of the country, and construction practices must be adapted to the local risk level using seismic zone maps.
3. Impact on Multistorey Buildings
Earthquake forces cause lateral movement and vibrations.
Taller buildings experience greater sway and stress.
Improper proximity between buildings can cause them to collide during tremors, leading to mutual damage.
Codes like IS 4326 mandate separation gaps and expansion joints to prevent such failures.
4. Importance of Seismic Codes
Seismic design codes (e.g., IS 1893, IS 4326, IS 13920) guide safe design and detailing of structures to resist earthquake loads. These codes ensure structures survive moderate quakes with minimal damage and resist collapse in major ones.
5. Literature Review Highlights
Numerous researchers have analyzed multistorey buildings in various seismic zones using software like STAAD Pro and ETABS. Key findings include:
Higher seismic zones demand more reinforcement, base shear capacity, and careful detailing.
Dynamic analysis (like Response Spectrum or Time History methods) provides more accurate insights than static methods.
Bracing systems and shear walls significantly improve seismic performance.
Buildings on sloped terrain show different seismic behaviors and need special consideration.
Code evolution (e.g., IS 1893:1984 vs. 2002) significantly changes seismic force estimates and design safety.
Irregular structures (asymmetric layouts, floating columns) are more vulnerable and require special design attention.
6. Key Recommendations
Structures must be designed per IS codes without deviation.
Separation between adjacent buildings must account for dynamic displacements.
Use of shear walls, base isolators, and ductile detailing is encouraged.
Continuous inspection and certification at each construction stage are crucial.
Conclusion
Seismic analysis is crucial for ensuring the stability and safety of multistorey buildings in different seismic zones. The reviewed literature emphasizes that buildings located in higher seismic zones experience greater seismic forces, requiring more robust structural design strategies. Dynamic analysis methods such as Response Spectrum and Time History analysis provide more accurate results than static methods, particularly for taller and irregular structures. Future research must focus on advanced modeling techniques, consideration of soil-structure interaction, and performance-based design to enhance the resilience of multistorey buildings against seismic events.
References
[1] Anamika Singh, Rajeev Singh Parihar, Abhay Kumar Jha, Barun Kumar, and Rajesh Misra, \"Seismic Analysis for Zone III, IV, V of (G+14) Multistorey Building with Bracings System Using Staad Pro Software,\" International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology (IJRASET), DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.48391.
[2] Ahirwar, S.K., Jain, S.K., and Pande, M.M., \"Earthquake Loads on Multistorey Buildings as Per IS: 1893-1984 and IS: 1893-2002: A Comparative Study,\" The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.
[3] B. Ramakrishna, G. Swetha, S.K. AmreenShazia, K. SaiKiran, and S. DurgaVenkata Dinesh,\"Analysis of Multi-Storied Building in Different Seismic Zones using STAAD Pro,\"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 982, 2022, 012074.DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/982/1/012074.
[4] Brajesh Kumar Tondon | Dr. S. Needhidasan \"Seismic Analysis of Multi Storied Building in Different Zones\" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-2, February 2018, pp.683-688, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd9490.pdf
[5] Devi, K., & Petal, S. (2023). A Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Buildings in Different Seismic Zones. Journal of Smart Buildings and Construction Technology, 5(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbct.v5i2.5673.
[6] Kusuma, S., & Ramesh Babu, E. (2020) \"Seismic Analysis of Multistory Building Using ETABS with Comparison of Response Spectrum Method and Time History Method,\" Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), Volume 7, Issue 5, pp. 711-717.
[7] Gupta Arvind Kumar and BaigMirzaAamir, \"Comparison and Analysis of Multistoried R.C.C. Building in Different Seismic Zones,\" International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology (IJARIIT), Volume 3, Issue 4, 2017, ISSN: 2454-132X, Impact Factor: 4.295.
[8] IS: 1893: 2002, Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings [Internet]. Available from: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.1893.1.2002.pdf
[9] IS 13920: 2016, Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces-Code of Practice [Internet]. Available from: https://docs.bentley.com/LiveContent/web/STAAD.Pro%20Help-v18/en/GUID-C7639074-0B02-4FE2-976D-1BCE0A76FEA1.html
[10] IS-875(PART-1): 1987, Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structure. Part 1: Dead Loads-Unit Weight of Building Material and Stored Materials [Internet]. Available from: https://civilbuzz.yolasite.com/resources/is.875.1.1987.pdf
[11] IS-875(PART-2): 1987, Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structure. Part 2: Imposed Loads [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cracindia.in/admin/uploads/IS-875---2.pdf
[12] MahantheshNaik K.P and Dr. H. Eramma,\"Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building in Zone II and Zone V by Considering Different Angles of Slope Ground,\" International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM), Volume 5, Issue 9, September 2023, pp. 518–532. DOI: 10.35629/5252-0509518532
[13] Naresh, M. V., & Brahma Chari, K. J. (2019) \"Study on Static and Dynamic Analysis of Multi-storied Building in Seismic Zones,\" International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), Volume 7, Issue 6C2, April 2019 ISSN: 2277-3878.
[14] P. Rajeswari and A. KotiNeelakantam, \"Seismic Analysis and Design of Multistorey Building in Different Seismic Zones by Using ETABS,\" International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume 6, Issue 9, September 2019, pp. 1–6.
[15] PushplataArmo ,Bhavesh Kumar Jha, 2022, Seismic Analysis and Design of Multi – Storey Building in STAAD Pro for Zone II, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) Volume 11, Issue 05 (May 2022).
[16] Pardeshi Sameer and Prof. N. G. Gore, \"Study of Seismic Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Building,\" International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume 03, Issue 01, Jan 2016, e-ISSN: 2395-0056, p-ISSN: 2395-0072, Impact Factor: 4.45.
[17] Rohan Suresh Duduskar , Dr. D. S. Yerudkar , Dr. M Rai Sharma, 2021, Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with and without Floating Column and Shear Wall, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) Volume 10, Issue 07 (July 2021).
[18] Sekar, T., and Kadappan, PL. (2015). Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings Resting on Normal and Sloping Grounds in Different Seismic Zones with and without Base Isolator. i-manager’s Journal on Structural Engineering, 4(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.4.1.3463
[19] TejaswiniWagh, Disha Patel, KrupaPhakatkar, DiptiYenegure, and Tejashri S. Gulve, \"Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Building (G+9) by Using STAAD-PRO,\" International Journal of Advance Scientific Research and Engineering Trends (IJASRET), Volume 6, Issue 6, June 2021, pp. 230–235. DOI: 10.51319/2456-0774.2021.6.0054
[20] UmamaheswaraRaoTallapalem, NurullaShaik, and GopiPagidimarry,\"Analysis of Multi-Storey Building in Different Seismic Zones of India,\"
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology (IJRAT), Vol. 7, No. 5, May 2019, pp. 488–493.
[21] Verma, Kavita, and AhsanRabbani, \"Analysis of G+6 Building in Different Seismic Zones of India Using Method of Static Analysis,\" International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), Volume 6, Issue 2, April 2018, ISSN: 2320-2882.
[22] Venkatesh, D., &Saravanan, M. (2022). \"Design and analysis of building in different seismic zone & wind,\" Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 62, Part 6, Pages 4065-4072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.625