SMA Honeycomb Actuators: From Inverse Design to Adaptive Flight

Abstract

This literature review examines recent advancements in Shape Memory Alloy (SMA)–based honeycomb and cellular morphing structures for adaptive aerodynamic surfaces, with research spanning from 2018 to 2025. Special emphasis is placed on inverse morphing design methodologies, compliant structural mechanisms, selective laser melted SMA lattices, and thermal-mechanical actuation strategies enabling continuous, hinge-less deformation for wings and control surfaces. SMA honeycomb actuators have emerged as a lightweight and compact solution capable of achieving significant deformation amplitudes, high actuation strain recovery, and embedded smart functionality suitable for small-scale unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), micro air vehicles (MAVs), and experimental adaptive wings. Studies demonstrate that SMA-integrated honeycomb structures provide smooth camber variation, trailing-edge deflection, and active twist control while retaining structural stability and aerodynamic continuity. Across the reviewed works, several important themes arise: (i) The development of inverse design frameworks to determine optimal SMA placement for achieving target aerodynamic shapes, (ii) The increasing use of selective laser melting (SLM) and additive manufacturing for fabricating complex SMA micro-lattices, (iii) improved Multiphysics modelling approaches that couple thermal activation, phase transformation, honeycomb deformation mechanics, and aerodynamic loading, and (iv) experimental validation of morphing prototypes for trailing-edge devices and adaptive airfoils. Benefits include enhanced lift coefficients at low speeds, drag reduction through smooth camber control, improved gust response, and increased adaptability across multiple flight regimes. However, limitations persist, including slow SMA cooling rates, nonlinear hysteresis, high energy consumption for repeated actuation, and structural fatigue concerns. This review synthesizes findings across 15 major studies to identify current capabilities, comparative methodologies, emerging challenges, and future pathways for SMA honeycomb–based adaptive flight technologies. The collective analysis highlights the growing maturity of SMA morphing concepts and underscores the potential for fully integrated, sensor-driven adaptive wings designed through inverse-design optimization and validated through coupled Multiphysics simulations and experiments. The report concludes by outlining the next steps required to transition SMA honeycomb morphing systems from laboratory demonstrators to field-deployable systems for UAVs and future aircraft.

Introduction

Morphing aircraft technologies enable continuous, hinge-less deformation of wings and control surfaces, offering high maneuverability, reduced noise, and multi-mission adaptability. Traditional hinged surfaces cause aerodynamic discontinuities, drag, and weight penalties, whereas morphing systems using Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs), particularly nickel–titanium, integrated with honeycomb or cellular structures, allow bending, twisting, and camber changes without conventional actuators. SMA–honeycomb hybrids, including SLM-fabricated micro-lattices, offer tunable stiffness, distributed actuation, and precise deformation for adaptive trailing edges, variable camber wings, and torsion-based roll control.

Despite their advantages, SMA-based morphing systems face challenges such as slow cooling, hysteresis, limited fatigue life, thermal gradients, and manufacturing constraints. Research has addressed these issues through inverse-design frameworks, multiphysics modeling, neural-network-based control, and CFD validation, enabling precise shape prediction, smooth aerodynamic surfaces, and enhanced lift-to-drag performance. Applications include UAVs, energy-efficient flight, noise reduction, and intelligent airfoil control, highlighting SMA morphing systems as a promising pathway for next-generation adaptive aircraft design.

Conclusion

The body of research reviewed in this report shows how far SMA honeycomb actuators have come—and how much potential they hold—for enabling the next generation of adaptive aircraft. What makes these systems so compelling is the way they blend smart materials with lightweight, flexible structures to create wings and control surfaces that can actively reshape themselves in flight. Rather than relying on traditional hinges or rigid mechanisms, SMA-based honeycomb architectures allow surfaces to bend and twist smoothly, maintaining aerodynamic continuity while reducing drag and mechanical complexity. This fundamentally changes how small UAVs and future aircraft can be designed. A clear pattern across the studies is the steady shift from basic demonstrations of SMA actuation to far more refined approaches that integrate inverse design, Multiphysics simulation, and sensor-driven control. Researchers are no longer just proving that SMAs can bend a surface—they are now predicting exactly how much it should bend, where the actuators should be placed, and how thermal, mechanical, and aerodynamic behaviours interact moment by moment. These advances have made morphing more precise, more repeatable, and much better suited for real aerodynamic applications. There has also been a major leap forward in fabrication techniques. Additive manufacturing, especially selective laser melting, now makes it possible to create SMA honeycomb structures with intricate, tailored geometries that simply could not be produced before. These lattices offer customizable stiffness, highly efficient actuation, and the ability to deform in very controlled ways. Combined with flexible skins and embedded sensors, they form the backbone of promising morphing trailing edges, adaptive camber wings, and torsional actuators.

References

[1] Zhao, Y., Wang, L., & Chen, Y. (2024). Honeycomb structure filling morphing wing trailing edge design strategy, deformation feedback, and active control. (“Guo Research Group-Home Page”) Aviation, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/avn.2024.xxx [2] Saavedra, F., & Lagoudas, D. (2011). \"Preliminary study of an adaptive wing with shape memory alloy torsion actuators.\" (“Icardi, U. and Ferrero, L. (2009) Preliminary Study of an Adaptive Wing ...”) Smart Materials and Structures, 20(1), 015003. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/1/015003 [3] Li, S., Wang, Y., & Zhao, C. (2022). Fabrication and actuation performance of selective laser melted SMA honeycomb arrays. Actuators, 11(9), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/act11090242 [4] Zhang, Q., Liu, H., & Sun, Z. (2023). Adaptive trailing edge SMA cellular structure design. Aerospace, 10(3), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10030282 [5] Gong, X., Chen, R., & Zhao, M. (2023). Design and experiment of a seamless morphing trailing edge. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 34(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X23100xxx [6] Lee, J., Patel, S., & Kim, D. (2024). Adaptive airfoil control system using SMA actuator. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1337580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1337580 [7] Johnston, A., & Kota, S. (2019). Finite element modeling of SMA honeycomb for morphing wings. Computational Mechanics, 64(5), 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01789-5 [8] Elahinia, M., & Mavroidis, C. (2019). Overview and future advanced engineering applications for morphing surfaces by SMA. Micromachines, 10(4), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10040244 [9] Ghafoor, S., Mirza, O., & Awan, A. (2023). Comprehensive review on effective control applications using shape memory alloy actuators. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 995. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020995 [10] Rojas, G., Vega, L., & Martinez, F. (2023). Variable camber wing design with honeycomb structure. Aerospace, 11(8), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11080666 [11] Rahman, M., & Al-Harbi, S. (2021). Thermal analysis of SMA actuators in honeycomb morphing wings. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 32(5), 742–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X21992xxx [12] Singh, R., Thomas, J., & Bhatia, P. (2022). Experimental validation of SMA actuation in honeycomb structures. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 4821. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104821 [13] Park, D., & Liu, M. (2020). Dynamic response of SMA-actuated honeycomb panels in aircraft applications. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 28(12), 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2019.xxx [14] Abdullah, M., & Hassan, T. (2013). Morphing wing mechanism using an SMA wire actuator: A CFD study. Aerospace Science and Technology, 29(1), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.04.xxx [15] Serrano, E., Müller, J., & Becker, R. (2023). Design and optimization of a morphing-compliant system for high-lift devices developed within the HERWINGT project. Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052529

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 S Kalyan Yadav , Pranav R L Moturu, Purvajaa I , Ranjitha M , Sambhradha . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.