Smart Landslide Detection: A Real-Time Monitoring and Alert System for Disaster Prevention

Abstract

The landslide detection system employs real-time environmental monitoring to identify potential landslides and mitigate risks in susceptible regions. The system integrates an ESP32 microcontroller with a suite of sensors, including a gyroscope for angular displacement measurement, a rain sensor for precipitation detection, and a DHT sensor for temperature and humidity acquisition. By continuously analyzing ground vibrations and slope variations, the system detects anomalous terrain shifts indicative of slope instability. The collected sensor data is processed using machine learning algorithms or predefined thresholds to assess landslide susceptibility based on historical geospatial datasets. A Python-based computational model correlates environmental parameters with past landslide occurrences, optimizing prediction accuracy. Upon detecting significant deviations in terrain stability or adverse meteorological conditions, the system triggers automated alerts via IoT-enabled communication protocols, notifying relevant authorities and at-risk populations. The predictive framework refines its accuracy over time through continuous data acquisition and model training, enhancing early warning capabilities. This proactive hazard mitigation approach ensures real-time risk assessment, facilitating timely evacuation measures and minimizing casualties and infrastructure damage in landslide-prone areas.

Introduction

1. Background and Need
Landslides are unpredictable natural disasters caused by heavy rain, seismic activity, deforestation, and unstable terrain. They pose severe threats to life, infrastructure, and the environment. Traditional landslide monitoring methods rely on manual observations and lack real-time predictive capabilities, resulting in delayed responses and increased risk.

2. Proposed Solution
To address these limitations, the Smart Landslide Detection System integrates:

• IoT sensors for real-time environmental monitoring

• AI and machine learning for predictive analytics

• Cloud-based platforms for data visualization and alerting

3. System Overview

• Hardware: Uses ESP32 microcontroller connected to sensors including gyroscope (slope angle), vibration sensors (ground movement), rain sensors, and DHT sensors (temperature & humidity).

• Data Processing: Real-time data is processed using AI models trained on historical landslide data to predict potential landslide events.

• Alert Mechanism: If risk is detected, the system sends automatic alerts via SMS, email, or apps to authorities and affected communities.

• Communication Protocols: Utilizes GSM, LoRa, or MQTT for IoT-based wireless data transmission.

4. Advantages of the System

• Proactive Monitoring: Detects early signs of landslides through sensor fusion and AI predictions.

• High Accuracy: Machine learning improves predictive accuracy and reduces false positives.

• Cost-Effective & Scalable: Uses low-cost hardware and is easily expandable to cover more regions.

5. Literature Review Insights

• Previous systems (Sharma, Gupta, Kumar) focus on real-time detection but lack AI-based prediction.

• Existing methods rely heavily on meteorological data or manual geotechnical surveys—often delayed and inaccurate.

• The proposed system fills this gap by combining real-time monitoring with intelligent prediction.

6. Key Features

• Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous data acquisition on soil moisture, slope, rainfall, and temperature.

• AI-Powered Analytics: Predicts landslides using a model trained on vibration data, images, and past incidents.

• Dashboard Interface: A web-based platform displays live sensor data, system health, and alerts.

• Multi-Level Access: Different roles (admin, researchers, public) ensure secure and organized access.

• Remote Accessibility: System is mobile-responsive for easy access and control from anywhere.

7. Implementation Methodology

• Step 1: Problem Identification: Understand regional landslide causes and contributing factors.

• Step 2: System Design:

  • Hardware: Sensors and GSM for real-time monitoring.

  • Software: AI models and cloud platform for data processing and alerting.

• Power Supply: A transformer-based circuit provides stable 5V power for the system, regulated via IC 7805.

Conclusion

The Smart Landslide Detection System successfully addresses the critical need for a reliable, real-time landslide monitoring and alert solution. By leveraging IoT technology, machine learning algorithms, and cloud-based infrastructure, the system provides accurate and timely detection of landslide-prone conditions, significantly improving early warning capabilities and disaster preparedness. Throughout development and testing, the system demonstrated high accuracy in predictions, rapid alert response, and user-friendly interface design. Its modular and cost-effective nature makes it suitable for deployment in both remote and densely populated areas. The integration of real-time data and predictive intelligence ensures that communities receive sufficient time to respond to potential hazards, ultimately reducing the risk to life and property. In conclusion, the project presents a scalable and impactful solution to mitigate landslide disasters. With further enhancements such as mobile app support, offline capability, and multi-hazard monitoring, the system holds great promise for becoming a comprehensive tool in global disaster risk management.

References

[1] P. Wallemacq and R. House, Economic losses, poverty & disasters: 1998–2017, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.undrr.org/publication/economic-losses-poverty-disasters-1998-2017 [2] CRED, Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years 2000–2019, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/CRED-Disaster-ReportHuman-Cost2000-2019.pdf [3] O. Rodríguez-Espíndola, S. Despoudi, P. Albores, and U. Sivarajah, “Achieving agility in evacuation operations: An evidence-based framework,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 33, no. 6/7, pp. 558–575, 2021. [4] CRED, 2021 Disasters in numbers, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/2021_EMDAT_report.pdf [5] CRED, Disasters year in review 2021, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/CredCrunch66.pdf [6] M. Falasca and C. W. Zobel, “A two-stage procurement model for humanitarian relief supply chains,” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 151–169, 2011. [7] M. Jahre, “Humanitarian supply chain strategies–A review of how actors mitigate supply chain risks,” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 82–101, 2017. [8] G. Wachira, “Conflicts in Africa as compound disasters: Complex crises requiring comprehensive responses,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 109–117, 1997. [9] FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2003–2008. Washington, DC, USA: FEMA, 2003. [10] A. P. L. Trias and A. D. B. Cook, “Future directions in disaster governance: Insights from the 2018 Central Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami response,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 58, May 2021, Art. no. 102180.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Mahathi B, Kirthika SS, Mr. K. Balaji. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.