The soil that acts as the basis for roadways are frequently modified and stabilised using chemicals and cement concrete compounds. The strength of the paving foundation is increased as a result of sub - grade enhancement, which also offers a superior operating surface for the building of the sections atop.
In order to stabilise the black cotton soil, in the present research, a by-product like lime kiln dust is used as an additive to combine with the expanding soil. To get the Atterberg Limits, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCC), as well as other characteristics, scientific experiments are conducted as part of the current study. According to the study, it is advised to combine LKD up to 15% with black cotton soil so that it may be utilised for foundation work and the building of pavement.
Introduction
This study investigates the stabilization of expansive soil—specifically black cotton soil (BCS)—using Lime Kiln Dust (LKD), a by-product of lime manufacturing. Expansive soils undergo volumetric changes with moisture variations, posing challenges in construction. Traditional soil replacement is costly, so chemical stabilization using industrial waste like LKD offers a cost-effective and sustainable alternative.
???? Background
Black cotton soil, rich in montmorillonite clay, is found across many Indian states and is known for high swelling and shrinkage behavior.
It has:
Liquid Limit (LL): 62%
Plastic Limit (PL): 39%
Plasticity Index (PI): 24%
Classified as CH (high plasticity) soil.
Soil stabilization improves soil performance and reduces construction risks.
Methods: Mechanical (blending with other soils) and Chemical (using additives like lime, cement, fly ash).
Due to rising costs of common stabilizers, LKD is studied as an alternative.
???? Materials & Methods
A. Materials Used
Black Cotton Soil (BCS): Collected from Jabalpur, M.P. (0–2 m depth).
Lime Kiln Dust (LKD): Contains 85% CaO; corrosive, with high pH (~12), and significant alumina and silica.
B. Sample Preparation
Soil dried (air + oven), then mixed with 5%, 10%, and 15% LKD.
Mixtures were carefully blended for homogeneity.
C. Tests Conducted
Grain Size Distribution – ASTM D442
Atterberg Limits – ASTM D4318
Proctor Test – ASTM D698 (Method A) for moisture-density relation
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) – To assess subgrade strength
???? Key Results
1. Atterberg Limits
Plasticity Index (PI) decreased with increasing LKD:
Native PI: 24
With 5% LKD: PI = 20
With 15% LKD: PI = 17
LKD increases plastic limit more than liquid limit → overall reduction in plasticity, improving workability.
2. Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS)
Strength increased with LKD and curing time.
10% LKD yielded maximum strength gains:
Unsoaked and soaked samples showed up to 200% strength increase after 7 days.
However, strength gain was not linear for higher LKD (15%), suggesting an optimal dosage at 10%.
3. Dry Density (Proctor Test)
Peak dry density was achieved at 10% LKD, indicating optimum compaction behavior.
4. CBR Values
CBR increased significantly with LKD addition.
10% LKD showed maximum improvement, enhancing load-bearing capacity.
Conclusion
A series of laboratory experiments and field investigations were conducted to evaluate the characteristics of LKD-stabilized subgrade soils.
1) The addition of LKD was effective in reducing the plasticity of all soil, the addition should be upto 10% above that it makes opposite effect.
2) The UC strength of all samples increased substantially with the addition of LKD. LKD-treated soils showed the highest strength gain, and strength continued to increase with time.
3) The average of the estimated CBR values for LKD-treated black cotton soil was increased.
References
[1] Diego Baragano, Jose Luis R. Gallego, Ruben Forjan 2021. Short-term experiment for the in situ stabilization of a polluted soil using mining and biomass waste. Journal of Environmental Management 296.
[2] Dharmendra Barman, Sujit Kumar Dash. 2022. Stabilization of expansive soils using chemical additives: A review” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 14:1319-1342
[3] Antonio Alberto S. Correia, Maria Graça Rasteiro. 2016. Nanotechnology Applied to Chemical Soil Stabilization. Procedia Engineering Volume 143, 2016, Pages 1252–1259
[4] Samuel J. Abbey , Eyo U. Eyo, Chukwueloka A.U. Okeke , Samson Ngambi. 2021.Experimental study on the use of RoadCem blended with by-product cementitious materials for stabilisation of clay soils. Construction and Building Materials 280
[5] M.S. Deepak, S. Rohini, B.S. Harini, G. Beulah Gnana Ananthi. 2020. Influence of fly-ash on the engineering characteristics of stabilised clay soil. Materials Today: Proceedings.
[6] Ya-Song Feng, Yan-Jun Du.2020. Environmental Properties of Industrially Contaminated Site Soil Solidified/Stabilized with a Sustainable By-product-based Binder. Science of the Total Environment DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142778.
[7] P. Gireesh Kumar, S. Harika.2020. Stabilization of expansive subgrade soil by using fly ash. Materials Today: Proceedings.
[8] Peduruhewa H. Jeewani, Lukas Van Zwieten, Zhenke Zhu , Tida Ge, Georg Guggenberger, Yu Luo , Jianming Xu.2021.Abiotic and biotic regulation on carbon mineralization and stabilization in paddy soils along iron oxide gradients Soil Biology and Biochemistry 160 (2021) 108312
[9] Yonghyeon Lee, Mingcan Cui, Zhengchang Han.2021.Evaluation of stabilizing material and stabilization efficiency through comparative study of toxic heavy metal transfer between corn and peanut grown in stabilized field soil. Environmental Pollution 275 (2021) 116617