Comparative Study of Strength Parameters on Concrete Made Using Expanded Polystyrene Beads, Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate and Waste Iron Chips- A Review
Authors: Ms. Pragati P. Waghamare , Prof. Mayur M. Lohe
The demand for sustainable and cost-effective construction materials has accelerated the exploration of alternative aggregates to replace conventional coarse aggregates in concrete production. This review focuses on the comparative analysis of strength parameters in concrete produced using Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) beads, Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate (LECA), and waste iron chips. These materials offer promising advantages in terms of environmental sustainability, structural efficiency, and resource optimization. While EPS beads and LECA provide significant weight reduction and improved thermal insulation, waste iron chips enhance the density and potentially increase the compressive strength due to their metallic composition. This paper presents a detailed examination of existing studies to highlight the mechanical performance, workability, durability, and potential structural applications of concrete modified with these lightweight and waste-derived materials.
Introduction
The text reviews sustainable alternatives to conventional concrete by examining the use of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) beads, Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate (LECA), and Waste Iron Chips (WIC) as partial replacements for natural aggregates. Since traditional concrete production heavily consumes natural resources and contributes to environmental degradation, lightweight concrete (LWC) has emerged as an effective solution by reducing structural dead load, improving thermal insulation, and enhancing sustainability without significantly compromising performance.
EPS beads significantly reduce concrete density and improve insulation and workability but cause a notable reduction in compressive, tensile, and flexural strength due to weak bonding with the cement matrix. As a result, EPS-based concrete is generally suitable for non-load-bearing and insulation applications. LECA offers a better balance between weight reduction and mechanical strength, providing good durability, fire resistance, and thermal performance, making it suitable for both structural and non-structural uses. Waste iron chips, derived from industrial machining processes, enhance compressive and flexural strength and toughness when used in controlled proportions, though issues related to corrosion, workability, and uniform dispersion must be addressed.
The literature indicates that hybrid concrete mixes combining lightweight aggregates (EPS or LECA) with waste iron chips can offset strength loss while maintaining reduced density. However, most existing studies focus on individual materials rather than their combined effects. Identified research gaps include the lack of standardized mix designs, limited long-term durability studies, insufficient large-scale and economic feasibility analyses, and minimal use of predictive modeling techniques.
The aim of the study is to comparatively evaluate the compressive, tensile, and flexural strength of concrete incorporating EPS, LECA, and WIC, either individually or in combination, and to identify optimal mix proportions that balance strength, weight reduction, durability, and sustainability. The research also seeks to assess workability, density, water absorption, and thermal insulation properties to determine the practical applicability of these eco-friendly concrete solutions in modern construction.
Conclusion
From the review of current literature, it is evident that the integration of alternative materials such as EPS beads, LECA, and waste iron chips into concrete can significantly influence its mechanical and durability characteristics. EPS beads are most beneficial for lightweight applications where thermal insulation is a priority, though their lower strength limits structural use.
LECA offers a superior balance between weight reduction and mechanical strength, making it a promising substitute for conventional aggregates in both structural and architectural applications. Waste iron chips not only contribute to waste minimization but also enhance strength, particularly in compressive and flexural aspects, though careful mix design is necessary to prevent segregation and corrosion. Comparative studies highlight that hybrid mixes or the combination of these materials may offer optimal performance in terms of both sustainability and structural integrity. Future research should focus on long-term durability studies, corrosion behavior, life cycle assessment, and practical implementation strategies to further explore the feasibility of large-scale adoption. As construction practices shift toward greener technologies, such comparative evaluations serve as a critical foundation for engineering sustainable and high-performance concrete materials.
References
[1] Abhishek M, Shashi Preetham N, Shreehari P P, Mohammed Akthar S A, Arvind Gowda A, 2022, Parametric Study on Strength of Light Weight Concrete by using EPS Beads and Bagasse Ash, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) ACME – 2022 (Volume 10 – Issue 10)
[2] Al-Jabri KS, Hisada M, Al-Oraimi SK, Al-Saidy AH. Copper slag as sand replacement for high performance concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31, pp. 483 – 488, 2009, Elsevier Ltd.
[3] Abdulkadir kana and ramazon demirbogaba Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkey, Indian journal of engineering and material sciences vol. 14 april 2007, PP. 158-162
[4] Abhijit Mandlik, Tarun Sarthak Sood, Shekhar Karade, Sangran Naik, Amruta Kulkarni, (2015), “Lightweight Concrete Using EPS”, International Journal of Science and Research, Volume 4 Issue 3, Page: 2007-2010.
[5] Ali K., Ghalehnovi .M, Brito J. de, Shamsabadi E. A, (2017) Durability performance of structural concrete containing Expanded polystyrene (EPS) and marble industry waste powder.Journal of Cleaner Production 170 (page) 42 and 60.
[6] Abdulkadir Kan & Ramazan Demirboga, et al (2007) “Effect of cement and EPS beads ratios on compressive strength and density of lightweight concrete” RESERCHGATE 489-495.
[7] Adhikary, S. K., Ashish, D. K., Sharma, H., Patel, J., Rudžionis, Ž., Al-Ajamee, M., Thomas, B. S., & Khatib, J. M. (2022). Lightweight self-compacting concrete: A review. Results in Chemical and Radiochemical Advances, 200107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200107
[8] Alwaeli, M. (2016). The implementation of scale and steel chips waste as a replacement for raw sand in concrete manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1038-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.211
[9] ASTM C 1240-11 “standard specification for Expanded polystyrene (EPS) used in cementitious mixtures”.
[10] ACI Committee 544. 1989. Measurement of properties Expanded polystyrene (EPS)s reinforced concrete, (ACI 544.2R-889). American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
[11] ACI committee 544. 1982. State-of-the-report on Expanded polystyrene (EPS) reinforced concrete, (ACI 544.1R-82), Concrete International: Design and Construction. 4(5): 9-30, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
[12] Amudhavalli N. K., Mathew Jeena. (2012) Effect of Expanded polystyrene (EPS) on strength and durability parameters of concrete. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Emerging Technologies. Volume 3, Issue 1, pp: 28-35.
[13] Batayneh M, Marie I, Asi I. Use of selected waste materials in concrete mixes. Waste Management, 27, pp. 1870 – 1876, 2007, Elsevier Ltd.
[14] Dharmaraj, R. (2021). Experimental study on strength and durability properties of iron scrap with fly ash-based concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37(2), 1041-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.290
[15] IS 383:1970 “Specifications for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[16] IS 456: 2000 – “Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete?, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[17] IS: 10262: 1982, “Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design” Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
[18] IS 2386:1963 “Methods of tests for aggregates for concrete”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
[19] J. B. Winsley and M. Muthukannan, \"A study on strength parameters of concrete with expanded fly ash clay aggregate,\" Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 56, pt. 6, pp. 3484-3489, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.128.
[20] Linchang Miao, Junhui Luo, Jiaqi Wang, and Yinan Chen, et al (2016) ”Durability of Modified Expanded Polystyrene Concrete after Dynamic Cyclic Loading” Volume 2016 |Article ID 2391476 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2391476
[21] Kreft O, Hausmann J, Hubalkova J, Aneziris CG, Sraube B, Schoch T. Pore size distribution effects on the thermal conductivity of light weight autoclaved aerated concrete. In: 5th International Conference on Autoclaved Aerated Concrete 14–17 September 2011, Bydgoszcz, Poland. p. 257–264.
[22] Moon, A. S., Selokar, L. S., Patle, A. I., Bhoyar, D. S., Kowale, S. D., & Quaz, S. S. (2020). Light Weight Concrete by Using EPS Beads. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7(7), 1-5.
[23] M. Gunavel, S. Aishwarya, K. Indhumathi, N. Jalapriya, and M. Keerthi Priya, \"Proportioning of Lightweight Concrete by the Inclusion of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS),\" International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 368, Feb. 2020. Available: http://www.ijert.org.
[24] Miah, M.J.; Ali, M.K.; Paul, S.C.; John Babafemi, A.; Kong, S.Y.; Šavija, B. Effect of Recycled Iron Powder as Fine Aggregate on the Mechanical, Durability, and High Temperature Behavior of Mortars. Materials 2020, 13, 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13051168
[25] M. S. Shetty, „CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY theory and practice?, 2012. ISBN 81–219–0003–4.
[26] Miled K, K. Sab and R.Le Roy, 2007, „Particle size effect on EPS light weight concrete compressive strength?. Mechanics of materials, 39 :222-240
[27] Patidar, H., Singi, M., & Bhawsar, A. (2019). Effect of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) on Strength Parameters of Concrete as a Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregates. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 6(6), 3779-3784.
[28] Puram, V., & Nikhar, M. (2023). Review on parametric study on effect of expanded polystyrene beads on physical properties of concrete. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 11(3), 825-832.
[29] Šeputyt?-Jucik?, J.; V?jelis, S.; Kizinievi?, V.; Kairyt?, A.; Vaitkus, S. The Effect of Expanded Glass and Crushed Expanded Polystyrene on the Performance Characteristics of Lightweight Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 4188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13074188
[30] S. Arivalagan and K. S. A. Dinesh Kumar, \"Experimental Study on Light Weight Concrete by Using Light Expanded Clay Aggregate (LECA),\" International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 48111, 2022. doi: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.48111.
[31] Uysal, O.; Uslu, ?.; Akta?, C.B.; Chang, B.; Yaman, ?.Ö. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate Concrete. Buildings 2024, 14, 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061871
[32] VarshaSri, K., Vardhan, G. V., Swathi, K., Prasanna, D., Chandini, R., Poojith, G., & Nayak, R. R. (2024). Comparative study on lightweight concrete by using light expanded clay aggregate and pumice stone. E3S Web of Conferences, 591, 09001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459109001
[33] Vinay Kumar, C.H., Arun, E., & Bhaskar, B. (2021). Lightweight concrete using EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) beads. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 2(8), 1591-1598. ISSN 2582-7421. Retrieved from www.ijrpr.com.
[34] Vandale Amar Diliprao, Dr. V. V. Patil, et al (2019) “Making of Lightweight Concrete by using EPS Beads as Replacement of Coarse Aggregate” (IJSRDV) Volume: 7, Issue: 3 ISSN 828-832
[35] Wang, J.; Hu, B.; Soon, J.H. Physical and Mechanical Properties of a Bulk Lightweight Concrete with Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Beads and Soft Marine Clay. Materials 2019, 12, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101662