Quadcopter is a type of Unmanned Arial Vehicle(UAV) used across the world in the field of defence , agriculture , surveillance and logistics. The stress analysis is necessary for payload efficieny, flight stability and structureal integrity of the frame. This study presents the design and stress analysis of quadcopter frame for structural reliability under dynamic loading conditions. A 3D CAD model of the frame was developed in Autodesk Inventor Professional 2024 followed by Finite Element Analysis (FEA)(Stress Analysis)to evaluate the distribution of stress , strain and displacement(deformation).Although there are various factors affecting the overall performance of the Quadcopter our work is limited to designing ,modelling and evaluating of the frame analysis.
Introduction
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are rapidly advancing in the aviation industry, making the design of strong and lightweight quadcopter frames essential for efficient performance. The frame must have a high strength-to-weight ratio, durability, and resistance to dynamic loads to ensure stability and longer flight time. Traditional materials like metal, wood, and plastic were heavy, but modern composite materials such as fiber-reinforced polymers offer better performance.
The study focuses on designing and analyzing a quadcopter frame using CAD and Finite Element Analysis (FEA), which allows testing under different load conditions without building physical prototypes, reducing cost and time. The frame must support key components like motors, battery, and controller while protecting them during flight.
The design process includes modeling the frame parts (base, head, arms), assembling them, assigning materials, applying loads, and performing simulation analysis. A force of 15 N is applied to evaluate structural behavior.
Results show that composite materials perform better than aluminum, producing lower stress and strain, making them more suitable for quadcopter frame construction.
Overall, the study demonstrates that using lightweight composite materials and simulation tools leads to stronger, more efficient, and cost-effective drone frame designs.
Conclusion
The above design and analysis of the frame in Autodesk Inventor Professional lead to the following conclusion:
The total stress analysis was done in Autodesk Invent0r Professional which concluded that the frame designed lie within the safest limit. The frame can withstand more electronic component apart without affecting the drone structure. As the analysis suggest that the composite fibre is more reliable for futher project ,therefore it was chosen as the material for manufacturing the frame.
References
[1] S. Sreeramoju and M. S. Rao, “Design and Analysis of Quad Copter Chassis Using Shape Optimization Technique,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, vol. 11, no. 3, Mar. 2023.
[2] C. S. Kalyan, M. Srujana, A. N. Reddy, P. P. Kalyan, J. V. G. Reddy, R. Koushik, and M. Abhilash, “Design and Static Structural Analysis of a Quadcopter,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 3565–3568, 2021.
[3] S. Marneni, C. Soniya, and H. Krupa, “Design and analysis of quadcopter drone frame using finite element analysis,” Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2024.
[4] F. Ahmad, P. Kumar, and P. P. Patil, “Analysis of a Pre-Stressed Quadcopter Propeller Using Finite Element Approach,” Journal of Graphic Era University, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 105–120, 2021.
[5] A. Santana, P. Afonso, A. Zanin, and R. Wernke, “Costing models for capacity optimization in Industry 4.0: Trade-off between used capacity and operational efficiency,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 16, pp. 61–66, 2018.
[6] A. Martinetti, M. Margaryan, and L. van Dongen, “Simulating mechanical stress on a micro unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) body frame for selecting maintenance actions,” Procedia Manufacturing, 2018.
[7] S. Ibrahim, B. Alkali, A. Oyewole, S. B. Alhaji, A. A. Abdullahi, and I. A. G., “Structural Integrity Study for a Quadcopter Frame to Be Deployed for Pest Control,” Evergreen, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 667–672, 2021.
[8] M. Subramanian, K. H. Babu, D. Praveenkumar, S. Vimalkanth, and R. Vijaybabu, “Structural Analysis of FPV Drones for Enhanced Stability and Performance through Design Thinking Approach: A Computational Study,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 259–268, 2023.
[9] A. Somatkar, M. Kharde, V. Mali, S. Thakare, B. Dane, and V. Bhambere, “Structural and Modal Analysis of Quadcopter Frame: Material Optimization for Load-Bearing Efficiency,” International Journal of Multiphysics, vol. 18, no. 3, 2024.
[10] V. Sriram, M. Hareesh, K. M. Kumar, T. Ganesh, and V. V. Reddy, “Modeling and Analysis of Quadcopter,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, vol. 3, no. 10, May 2023.
[11] M. Urdea, “Stress and vibration analysis of a drone,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 1009, 2021.
[12] H. Liu, Y. Chen, and W. Zhang, “Lightweight design and structural analysis of UAV frame based on finite element method,” Composite Structures, vol. 152, pp. 38–45, 2016.
[13] Y. Zhao, “Design and analysis of quadcopter frame based on finite element method,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 1049–1050, pp. 1120–1124, 2014.
[14] A. G. Kendoul, “Survey of advances in guidance, navigation, and control of unmanned rotorcraft systems,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 315–378, 2012.
[15] P. Pounds, R. Mahony, and P. Corke, “Modelling and control of a quad-rotor robot,” in Proc. Australasian Conf. Robotics and Automation, 2006.
[16] S. Bouabdallah and R. Siegwart, “Full control of a quadrotor,” in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2007, pp. 153–158.