Surgical threads, also known as sutures, are critical tools in modern surgical procedures, enabling wound closure, tissue approximation, and hemostasis. Over the decades, significant advancements have been made in their materials, design, and bio-compatibility. This paper explores the classification, material science, clinical applications, and emerging innovations related to surgical threads. Emphasis is also placed on the comparison between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures, synthetic versus natural materials, and recent trends in antimicrobial and bioactive sutures.Innovations in Modern Surgery Considering availability of a wide variety of suture materials, it’s important to know the differences between various sutures before making an informed decision. Suture material\'s overall performance is influenced by its physical qualities, handling features, and biological factors. The aim of this seminar paper is to give highlights on the biological properties of suture materials. Suturing is not simply about closing a wound; it is a skill that requires finesse and can significantly impact the healing process, reduce complications, and even affect long-term results
Introduction
Effective wound closure is crucial in surgery to prevent infection and scarring. While alternatives like tissue adhesives and staples exist, surgical sutures remain the primary method for securely closing wounds. Sutures are materials used to stitch tissues and can be natural or synthetic, monofilament or braided.
Historically, suturing dates back thousands of years, with evidence from ancient Egypt (1100 BC), India (Sushruta, 500 BC), Mesopotamia, China, Greece (Hippocrates), and Rome (Galen, Celsus). Early sutures used materials like flax, hemp, silk, animal intestines (catgut), and later metals and synthetic fibers.
Sutures vary widely based on tissue needs, with some requiring short-term support (absorbable sutures) and others long-term (nonabsorbable). Absorbable sutures degrade in the body, eliminating removal discomfort, while nonabsorbable ones maintain strength for prolonged healing.
Suture classification depends on size, strength, absorbability, filament type, flexibility, and surface texture. Key properties include tensile strength, absorption rate, diameter, friction, knot security, elasticity, plasticity, memory, handling, tissue reaction, origin, ease of removal, and color.
Current sutures include natural (catgut, silk) and synthetic polymers (polyglycolic acid, nylon, polyester). Innovations such as silver nanoparticle-coated sutures for antimicrobial effect and drug-eluting sutures that release medication locally are emerging to improve healing outcomes.
References
[1] Surgical Sutures - A Review Amit Goel Department of General Surgery, Jamia Hamdard Medical College, New Delhi
[2] Review On Biological Properties of Suture Materials Gebremedhin .
[3] Review Paper: Absorbable Polymeric Surgical Sutures: Chemistry, Production, Properties, Biodegradability, and Performance CHENNAKKATTU KRISHNA SADASIVAN PILLAI AND CHANDRA P. SHARMA*
[4] Evolution of Suture Material - A Systemic Review Aeliya Rukhsar1*, Prof. Saiyad Shah Alam1, Prof. Gulamuddin Sofi2
[5] Absorbable sutures: chronicles and applications Prema D’Cunha1 , Benudhar Pande2 , Muralidhar S. Kathalagiri3 , Ashok Kumar Moharana4 , Deepak T. S.4*, Cismitha Sharol Pinto4
[6] James A. Greenberg, MD review on The Use of Barbed Sutures in Obstetrics and Gynecology
[7] CHENNAKKATTU KRISHNA SADASIVAN PILLAI AND CHANDRA P. SHARMA Review Paper: Absorbable Polymeric Surgical Sutures: Chemistry, Production, Properties, Biodegradability, and Performance
[8] RHH TAN, RJW BELL, BA DOWLING and AJ DART Suture materials: composition and applications in veternary wound repair
[9] Julio Hochberg, MD*, Kathleen M. Meyer, MD, Michael D. Marion, MD Suture Choice and Other Methods of Skin Closure
[10] Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992;18:785–95.
[11] Meyer RD, Antonini CJ. A review of sutures materials, part II. In: Compendium of CME in dentistry. Jamesburg Dental Learning Systems Co.; 1989. p. 360–8.
[12] Ammirati CT. Advances in wound closure material. In: James WD, editor, Advances in dermatology, 18. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002. p. 313–38.
[13] Szarmach RR, Livingston J, Rodeheaver GT, et al. An innovative surgical suture and needle evaluation and selection program. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2002;12(4):211–29.
[14] Hochberg J, Murray GF. Principles of operative surgery. In: Sabiston DC, editor. Textbook of surgery. 15th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992. p. 253–63.
[15] Bloom BS, Golberg D. Suture material in cosmetic cutaneous surgery. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2007;9(1):41–5.
[16] Trimbos JB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:274–80.
[17] Bennett RG. Selection of wound closure materials. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;18: 619–37.
[18] Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A. Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician 1991;44:2123–8
[19] Questell Z. Introduction to Sutures. Internal document. Mansfield, MA: Covidien Inc; 2009.
[20] Edlich RF, Gubler K, Wallis AG, Clark JJ, Dahlstrom JJ, Long WB 3rd. Wound closure sutures and needles: a new perspective. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2010; 29:339-61.
[21] Dennis C, Sethu S, Nayak S, Mohan L, Morsi YY, Manivasagam G. Suture materials - Current and
[22] Chaloupka K, Malam Y, Seifalian AM. Nanosilver as a new generation of nanoproduct in biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(11):580-8.