In this report, we investigate if vegetative noise barriers can be used to treat urban road noise in Nepal. Noise pollution has grown to be a serious worry for Nepal as more and more people move to cities and the number of vehicles increases there. While they block noise well, typical noise barriers cost a lot to set up and maintain and don’t help the environment. The research assesses whether vegetative barriers, made up of trees, shrubs and greenery, help reduce traffi c noise by absorbing it, redirecting it and keeping people from hearing it. Field measurement of sound levels in chosen urban locations was combined with analyzing vegetation which clearly shows a decrease in ambient noise when barriers are in place. Besides, the research ensures that air is cleaner, the area is more eye-pleasing and wildlife is better protected which support the nation’s desire to be sustainable. Problems related to tiny spaces, routine plant care and the differences in climate are also examined. The results support adding vegetative noise barriers to city planning and noise strategies because they are less expensive to build, more sustainable and support healthier cities across Nepal.
Introduction
Urban growth in Nepal’s cities like Kathmandu, Pokhara, and Biratnagar has led to increased traffic noise pollution, which negatively impacts health and quality of life. Conventional noise barriers (concrete, metal) are effective but costly, inflexible, and environmentally unfriendly. Vegetative noise barriers—using trees, shrubs, and plants—are emerging as a sustainable alternative. They not only reduce noise but also improve air quality, store carbon, and enhance urban biodiversity.
Problem:
Despite rising noise concerns, Nepal has limited use or research on green noise barriers. Challenges include plant selection, limited urban space, and maintenance difficulties. More study is needed to optimize vegetative barriers for Nepal’s unique environment.
Objectives:
Measure how much vegetative barriers reduce urban traffic noise.
Review environmental and social benefits.
Identify challenges in design and upkeep.
Propose ways to integrate these barriers into Nepal’s urban planning.
Significance:
The study promotes eco-friendly noise management strategies suitable for Nepalese cities and encourages multidisciplinary collaboration and public awareness.
Scope and Limitations:
Focused on traffic noise in selected urban sites, the study assesses noise reduction and ecological/social impacts of vegetative barriers. Limitations include variability by plant species, seasonal changes, urban space constraints, and limited field data.
Literature Review:
Traffic noise harms health and wellbeing. Conventional barriers have drawbacks such as high cost, aesthetic issues, and noise reflection. Vegetation absorbs and diffuses sound without reflecting it, providing ecological benefits like pollution filtration and habitat creation. Evergreen dense shrubs perform best, and hybrid barriers (plants + conventional structures) enhance noise reduction. However, space and maintenance challenges exist, especially in fast-growing urban Nepal with difficult terrain and climate. Success depends on government, planners, environmentalists, and communities working together.
Methodology:
Noise levels were measured in selected sites in Kathmandu and Pokhara, comparing roadsides with and without vegetative barriers. Both quantitative (sound levels, plant characteristics) and qualitative (community and expert surveys) data were collected. The study also evaluated costs, environmental benefits, and urban planning implications.
Findings:
Vegetative noise barriers reduced average noise levels by about 7 dB compared to no barriers, effectively halving noise intensity. Taller barriers (3–4 meters) with dense plantings like Nepali Alder, Bamboo, Pine, Rhododendron, Sal Tree, and Ficus were most effective. Vegetative barriers also improve air quality and biodiversity, offering a multifunctional solution for Nepal’s urban noise problem.
Conclusion
In the end, this study suggests that using vegetative barriers is an effective and ongoing way to reduce the problem of road traffic noise in Nepal, helps to green the urban environment and improves how people live there. It is shown that noise attenuation is enhanced when the design parameters for barriers are optimized for a particular location. By including vegetative barriers in Nepal’s city designs, people enjoy cleaner air, more varieties of nature and a more attractive and stronger urban landscape. Although it is difficult due to small spaces, unpredictable weather and expensive upkeep, vertical greening and hybrid barriers offer possible answers to these problems. The benefits seen in this research equip policymakers, urban planners and environmental stakeholders to recommend more widely using vegetative noise barriers in noise reduction. More studies are needed that study urban composting in several regions through different seasons which will better demonstrate the lasting effect and positive environmental outcomes of this practice. Also, careful analysis of species options, long-term cost-benefit comparisons and introducing community-run maintenance models will earn these projects a future in Nepal. As we advance research and methods for noise reduction in cities, future projects will assist in preparing greener, quieter and sustainable urban spaces for this country and its growing number of city dwellers.
References
[1] Aditya, A., Masykuri, M., & Setyono, A. (2022). Influence of urban green spaces on road traffic noise levels. ISPRS Archives, XLVIII-4/W3, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W3-2022-195-2022ISPRS Archives
[2] Agarwal, A., & Gupta, R. (2023). Effectiveness of vegetative noise barriers in urban environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(5), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-2200-0
[3] Baral, B., & Shrestha, S. (2021). Assessing air pollution tolerance of plant species in vegetation traffic barriers in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sustainable Environment Research, 31(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-00076-2Academia+1SpringerLink+1
[4] Bhusal, A., Jha, A., Khanal, A., Awasthi, A., & Mahato, A. K. (2023). Evaluation and mitigation of traffic-related concerns in Kathmandu Valley. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06121arXiv
[5] Chauhan, R., Shrestha, A., & Khanal, D. (2021). Noise pollution and effectiveness of policy interventions for its control in Kathmandu, Nepal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 35678–35689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13236-7ResearchGate+2SpringerLink+2SpringerLink+2
[6] Garg, N., Maji, S., & Sinha, A. K. (2022). Noise pollution control measures in urban areas: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 14567–14580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16234-8
[7] Gulia, P., & Gupta, A. (2016). Traffic noise control by periodically arranged trees. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Trends and Developments in Environmental Sustainability RTDES (pp. 123–130). ASCE.SpringerLink
[8] Harees, A. M., & Haan, C.-H. (2017). Identification of plant species for development of green belt in Thiruvananthapuram City. In ASCE India Conference 2017: Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Resilience and Sustainability of Infrastructure (pp. 45–52). ASCE.SpringerLink
[9] Herrington, L. P. (1976). Effect of vegetation on the propagation of noise in the out-of-doors. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, 25, 229–233.SpringerLink
[10] Huddart, L. (1990). The use of vegetation for traffic noise screening. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Wokingham.SpringerLink+1SpringerLink+1
[11] Kang, J., Smyrnowa, Y., Hornikx, M., & Forssén, J. (2012). Effect of vegetation on noise propagation in streets and squares. In Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics: Environmental Noise Propagation 2012: Definitions, Measuring and Control Aspects (Vol. 34, Part 1, pp. 57–67). Institute of Acoustics.SpringerLink
[12] Kang, J., & Zhang, M. (2010). Urban sound environment and its impact on human health. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.015
[13] Khanal, S. N., & Subedi, D. P. (1970). Assessment of traffic noise pollution in Banepa, a semi-urban town of Nepal. Current Science, 123(5), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v123/i5/677-686ResearchGate+2UNDIP E-Journal+2SpringerLink+2
[14] Kragh, J. (1979). Sound attenuation by vegetation belts. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 63(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(79)90474-4ResearchGate
[15] Li, Q., Qiu, L., & Zheng, S. (2021). Vegetation barriers along roads in urban city areas: Effects on noise levels. ISPRS Archives, XLVIII-4/W3, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W3-2022-195-2022ISPRS Archives
[16] Maji, S., & Sinha, A. K. (2016). Noise pollution control measures in urban areas: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7900-7
[17] Muzet, A. (2007). Environmental noise, sleep and health. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 11(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2006.09.001SpringerLink
[18] Orikpete, O. O., & Akinmoladun, F. O. (2021). Green areas as a factor for noise reduction in urban environments. ISPRS Archives, XLVIII-4/W3, 195–200. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W3-2022-195-2022ISPRS Archives
[19] Sharma, S., & Thapa, B. (2020). Noise pollution in Kathmandu Valley: Sources, effects, and control measures. Nepal Journal of Environmental Science, 8(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.3126/njes.v8i1.28567
[20] Ünver, M. (2008). Effects of noise barriers on reducing highway traffic noise. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326051The Heart Institute of East Texas, P.A.