In an era of fast digital transformation, technical documentation is more important than ever in aiding user knowledge, upkeep of systems, and operational efficiency across a variety of organizations. However, the ever-growing complexity of software platforms, enterprise applications, and IT infrastructures has resulted in a massive amount of technical content that is challenging to navigate and time-consuming to comprehend. Users, including developers, executives, end users, and support engineers, deserve accurate and easily accessible documentation. This study investigates the use of text summarizing techniques in technical documentation workflows to address the issues and improve the overall quality, usability, and efficacy of such content. Text Summarization (TS) entails condensing extensive text into brief forms while preserving its basic meaning. In technical documentation, this feature promotes faster information extraction, comprehension, and user engagement. The study defines two main summary techniques—extractive and abstractive—and assesses their efficacy in a documentation setting. Extractive summarization extracts essential lines or phrases straight from the source material while keeping the underlying structure and vocabulary, which is especially useful in circumstances that need technical precision. In contrast, abstractive summarization paraphrases and rewrites the text in a more reduced manner, resulting in greater fluidity and readability. This study proposes a hybrid model that combines these approaches to achieve a balance of clarity and accuracy. The process involves integrating traditional and transformer-based models like BERT, T5, and PEGASUS to technical documentation datasets. Using supervised fine-tuning and domain-specific corpora, the models are trained to provide summaries that are suited to different user needs. Finally, using text summarizing algorithms in technical documentation is a significant step toward more efficient, user-friendly, and intelligent content delivery. This study establishes the groundwork for creating adaptable documentation systems that match the changing needs of current users.
Introduction
1. Complexity of Enterprise IT Systems and Documentation Challenges
Enterprise IT systems are inherently complex due to their vast size, integration of multiple technologies, varied user base, and critical business operations. These systems often feature legacy components and constant updates, making them difficult to manage without clear and user-friendly documentation. Traditional documentation often fails users by being overly technical, jargon-heavy, and structured linearly, prioritizing technical accuracy over usability. This results in user frustration, increased support costs, and inefficiencies.
2. Importance of Human-Centered Design (HCD) in Documentation
To enhance documentation usability, HCD principles should be adopted. This involves understanding user needs through interviews, usability tests, and behavior analysis. Documentation should be tailored to user personas (novices, admins, support staff) and feature clear language, visual aids, modular structure, and accessible design (e.g., WCAG compliance). Integrating real-time help (tooltips, chatbots) and analytics can further improve clarity and relevance while reducing cognitive load.
3. Handling Documentation Glitches
To maintain quality, common issues such as broken links, inconsistencies, or ambiguous instructions must be addressed via:
Supports layered content delivery (brief overviews + deep dives)
Enhances searchability and AI-tool effectiveness (e.g., chatbots, auto-suggestions)
TS aligns with HCD by catering to users with different technical levels and time constraints. It’s especially useful in manuals, API docs, release notes, and UI-integrated help systems.
5. Literature Review
The literature survey covers advancements in TS, especially those powered by Deep Learning (DL) and Natural Language Processing (NLP). Key findings include:
Pre-trained models like BERT, T5, and PEGASUS offer strong summarization capabilities.
Various DL approaches (Seq2Seq, RL, TL) enhance performance across tasks.
Studies applied summarization to multiple languages, social media, and legal texts, showing high accuracy and usability.
Extractive and abstractive summarization methods both show promise, though extractive is easier to implement.
6. Generalized Methodology
A structured research methodology ensures the development of effective, usable documentation. This includes:
User research
Content modeling
HCD-based design iterations
Feedback integration
Automation and analytics for continuous improvement
References
[1] A. Chaves, C. Kesiku, and B. Garcia-zapirain, “Automatic Text Summarization of Biomedical Text Data?: A Systematic Review,” 2022.
[2] J. P. Verma et al., “Graph-Based Extractive Text Summarization Sentence Scoring Scheme for Big Data Applications,” pp. 1–28, 2023.
[3] A. Pramita et al., “Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1029–1046, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.05.006.
[4] A. Prasetya and F. Kurniawan, “A survey of text summarization?: Techniques , evaluation and challenges,” Nat. Lang. Process. J., vol. 7, no. April, p. 100070, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100070.
[5] M. M. Saiyyad, “Text Summarization Using Deep Learning Techniques?: A Review †,” pp. 4–9, 2024.
[6] I. Mobin, M. H. Mahadi, and A. K. Pathan, “A Review of the State-of-the-Art Techniques and Analysis of Transformers for Bengali Text Summarization,” vol. 1, no. Dl, pp. 1–29, 2025.
[7] B. Models and S. Abdel-salam, “Performance Study on Extractive Text Summarization Using,” 2022.
[8] G. Padmapriya and K. Duraiswamy, “Multi-document-based text summarisation through deep learning algorithm,” International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 459–479, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJBIDM.2020.107546.
[9] F. B. Goularte, S. M. Nassar, R. Fileto, and H. Saggion, “A text summarization method based on fuzzy rules and applicable to automated assessment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 115, pp. 264–275, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.047.
[10] N. Alami, M. Meknassi, and N. En-nahnahi, “Enhancing unsupervised neural networks based text summarization with word embedding and ensemble learning,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 123, pp. 195–211, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.037.
[11] F. A. Ghanem, M. C. Padma, and H. M. Abdulwahab, “Deep Learning-Based Short Text Summarization?: An Integrated BERT and Transformer Encoder – Decoder Approach,” 2025.
[12] M. M. Saiyyad, “Text Summarization Using Deep Learning Techniques?: A Review †,” pp. 4–9, 2024.
[13] Y. Yang, Z. Wu, Y. Yang, S. Lian, F. Guo, and Z. Wang, “applied sciences A Survey of Information Extraction Based on Deep Learning,” 2022.
[14] K. K. M. Et.al, “A Heuristic Approach for Telugu Text Summarization with Improved Sentence Ranking,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4238–4243, 2021, doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1714.
[15] W. S. El-Kassas, C. R. Salama, A. A. Rafea, and H. K. Mohamed, “Automatic text summarization: A comprehensive survey,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 165, no. November 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113679.
[16] K. K. C. Reddy, P. R. Anisha, N. G. Nguyen, and G. Sreelatha, “A Text Mining using Web Scraping for Meaningful Insights,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2089, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2089/1/012048.
[17] P. Bhattacharya, S. Poddar, K. Rudra, K. Ghosh, and S. Ghosh, Incorporating domain knowledge for extractive summarization of legal case documents, vol. 1, no. 1. Association for Computing Machinery, 2021.
[18] A. Qaroush, I. Abu Farha, W. Ghanem, M. Washaha, and E. Maali, “An efficient single document Arabic text summarization using a combination of statistical and semantic features,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 677–692, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.010.
[19] A.Alomari, N. Idris, A. Q. M. Sabri, and I. Alsmadi, “Deep reinforcement and transfer learning for abstractive text summarization: A review,” Computer Speech & Language, vol. 71, no. August 2021, p. 101276, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2021.101276.
[20] T. Shi, Y. Keneshloo, N. Ramakrishnan, and C. K. Reddy, “Neural Abstractive Text Summarization with Sequence-to-Sequence Models,” ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3419106.
[21] S. Bhargav, A. Choudhury, S. Kaushik, R. Shukla, and V. Dutt, “A comparison study of abstractive and extractive methods for text summarization,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. In press, no. April, 2021.
[22] P. Verma and A. Verma, “A Review on Text Summarization Techniques,” Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 64, no. 01, pp. 251–257, 2020, doi: 10.37398/jsr.2020.640148.
[23] T. Vodolazova and E. Lloret, “The Impact of Rule-Based Text Generation on the Quality of Abstractive Summaries,” in Proceedings - Natural Language Processing in a Deep Learning World, Oct. 2019, vol. 2019-Septe, pp. 1275–1284, doi: 10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_146.
[24] M. E. Moussa, E. H. Mohamed, and M. H. Haggag, “A survey on opinion summarization techniques for social media,” Future Computing and Informatics Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 82–109, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fcij.2017.12.002.
[25] Y. Kumar, K. Kaur, and S. Kaur, Study of automatic text summarization approaches in different languages, vol. 54, no. 8. Springer Netherlands, 2021.
[26] S. Kadry, H. Yong, and J. Choi, “Applied sciences Improved Text Summarization of News Articles Using GA-HC,” 2021.
[27] D. Qiu and B. Yang, “Text summarization based on multi-head self-attention mechanism and pointer network,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00527-2.
[28] A.A. Syed, F. L. Gaol, and T. Matsuo, “A survey of the state-of-the-art models in neural abstractive text summarization,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 13248–13265, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052783.
[29] N. Lin, J. Li, and S. Jiang, “A simple but effective method for Indonesian automatic text summarisation,” Connection Science, 2021, doi: 10.1080/09540091.2021.1937942.
[30] D. Suleiman and A. Awajan, “Deep Learning Based Abstractive Text Summarization: Approaches, Datasets, Evaluation Measures, and Challenges,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, pp. 1–29, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1155/2020/9365340.
[31] N. Bansal, A. Sharma, and R. K. Singh, “Recurrent neural network for abstractive summarization of documents,” Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 65–72, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09720529.2020.1721873.
[32] W. Xu, C. Li, M. Lee, and C. Zhang, “Multi-task learning for abstractive text summarization with key information guide network,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, vol. 2020, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13634-020-00674-7.
[33] A.P. Widyassari et al., “Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods,” J. King Saud Univ. - Comput. Inf. Sci., no. xxxx, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.05.006.
[34] Y. Chen, Y. Ma, X. Mao, and Q. Li, “Multi-Task Learning for Abstractive and Extractive Summarization,” Data Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41019-019-0087-7.
[35] Y. Zhang, D. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Fang, and W. Xiao, “Abstract text summarization with a convolutional seq2seq model,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9081665.
[36] M. M. Rahman and F. H. Siddiqui, “An optimized abstractive text summarization model using peephole convolutional LSTM,” Symmetry (Basel). vol. 11, no. 10, 2019, doi: 10.3390/sym11101290.
[37] Wang Q, Liu P, Zhu Z, Yin H, Zhang Q, Zhang L. A text abstraction summary model based on BERT word embedding and reinforcement learning. Applied Sciences 2019;9(21). doi:10.3390/app9214701.
[38] S. Gupta and S. K. Gupta, “Abstractive summarization: An overview of the state of the art,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 121, no. 2018, pp. 49–65, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.011.