The Role of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Reducing Injuries Among Construction Workers

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in preventing construction workers from getting injured. In construction projects, the principles of the working environment are expected to be safe, but unfortunately, the environment is notorious for accidents happening periodically. They are unconscious, conscious, interpersonal, and situational occupational hazards, and the variety and application of PPE, as well as factors that influence the use of PPE, are also highlighted. Drawing on statistical data derived from the number of accidents reported to the insurance companies and workers’ perception of workplace safety through surveys, it investigates the effects of PPE conformity on accident rate and the employer’s and workers’ roles, respectively. Therefore, from the above analysis, it can be concluded that the higher the PPE usage, the less likely an employee is to suffer an injury. Some of the challenges named include discomfort, lack of training, and weak enforcement as possible inhibitors. The final discussion provides recommendations for our next steps in enhancing the practice of PPE use, supporting the implementation of related policies, and contributing to existing data regarding the effects of smart PPE and longer-term safety results.

Introduction

The construction industry is globally recognized as one of the most hazardous sectors, with workers exposed to risks like falling objects, slips, hazardous substances, and machinery accidents. Despite existing safety regulations, accidents persist—largely due to non-compliance with safety practices, especially inconsistent use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

This study explores the role of PPE in minimizing injuries among construction workers, evaluates compliance levels, identifies barriers to proper use, and offers recommendations to improve workplace safety.

Key Findings:

1. Occupational Hazards in Construction:

Construction workers face multiple hazards—physical (e.g., noise, temperature), chemical (e.g., asbestos, dust), ergonomic (e.g., heavy lifting), and biological (e.g., mold, bacteria). Slips, trips, and falls are among the leading causes of fatalities.

2. Types and Functions of PPE:

Common PPE includes:

• Helmets: Protect against falling objects.

• Gloves: Shield from chemicals, cuts, or heat.

• Safety glasses/face shields: Prevent injury from flying debris and chemical splashes.

• Safety shoes: Protect feet from impact and punctures.

• Hi-vis vests and respirators: Improve visibility and protect from inhalation hazards.

Proper PPE selection depends on the task and associated risks.

3. Hierarchy of Controls in Safety Management:

According to NIOSH's Hierarchy of Controls, PPE is the least effective but often the most feasible option in construction where hazard elimination or substitution isn’t practical. PPE should be part of a broader safety strategy including training, supervision, and risk assessments.

4. Barriers to PPE Use:

Barriers include:

• Discomfort and impracticality of PPE for labor-intensive work.

• Lack of training on proper PPE usage and its importance.

• Poor safety culture and management enforcement, leading to neglect or misuse of PPE.

5. Relationship Between PPE and Injury Rates:

Historical data (2011–2021) shows fluctuating but persistently high injury rates in construction, with fatalities often linked to the "Fatal Four" (falls, struck-by, electrocution, caught-in/between). Sites with high PPE compliance report significantly lower injury rates, reinforcing PPE’s preventive value.

6. Worker Attitudes and Perceptions:

Surveys show high compliance with helmets (90.45%) and safety shoes (93.47%), but issues like discomfort and perceived low risk affect usage consistency. Workers often view PPE as burdensome unless a strong safety culture exists.

7. Employer Responsibilities:

Employers must:

• Provide standard-compliant PPE.

• Ensure training and enforcement.

• Conduct site inspections and risk assessments.

• Uphold workers’ rights and welfare, including non-discrimination and injury compensation.

8. Comparative Analysis:

Construction sites with PPE adherence over 90% experience fewer injuries (2.3/100 workers) than those below 70% compliance (6.7/100). Strong management commitment to safety correlates with higher PPE usage, fewer injuries, and better employee morale.

Recommendations:

1. Improve PPE Compliance through targeted awareness, comfort-enhancing gear, and training programs.

2. Strengthen Policy and Enforcement via regular audits, stricter regulations, and penalties for non-compliance.

3. Encourage Future Research on long-term PPE effectiveness and innovations like smart PPE with monitoring technologies.

Conclusion

The importance of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), having considerable significance in alleviating injuries in the construction industry, has been explained in this study. To date, injury rates are still shocking, even after the formulation of safety measures, a clear indication that PPE should be used and maintained at all times. The studies highlighted the fact that the usage of PPE reduces the rate of conventional construction site accidents, especially where standards of implementation and training are adhered to. Thus, factors like discomfort, perceived lack of training, and lack of managerial interest remain negative factors. It is quite clear that strategies for increasing awareness, evolving PPE design, or strengthening the enforcement of policies would go a long way to improving outcomes in the safety of healthcare workers. Also, the use of advanced technologies is considered a future trend in management. In general, PPE is essential in the protection of construction workers, and enhancing the quality of occupational health in this sector makes it imperative to further the promotion and use of this fundamental tool in enhancing the safety of workers on construction sites.

References

[1] Aryana, B., Osvalder, A.L. and Borell, J., 2024. Design strategies to reduce personal protective equipment noncompliance. Ergonomics in Design, 129, pp.57-66. [2] Hameed, S., Chethana, K., Sunu, Z. and Kiran, K.G., 2021. Awareness and usage of personal protective equipment among construction workers and their hearing assessment by pure tone audiometry; A cross-sectional study in South India. Journal of family medicine and primary care, 10(11), pp.4072-4076. [3] Adade-Boateng, A.O., Fugar, F. and Adinyira, E., 2021. Framework to improve the attitudes of construction workers towards safety helmets. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 26(2), pp.65-86. [4] Boakye, M.K., Adanu, S.K., Coffie, G.H., Adzivor, E.K. and Ayimah, J.C., 2022. Research article building construction artisans’ level of access to personal protective equipment (PPE) and the perceived barriers and motivating factors of adherence to its use. Occup Hazards, 27(29), pp.37-43. [5] Ammad, S., Alaloul, W.S., Saad, S. and Qureshi, A.H., 2021. Personal protective equipment (PPE) usage in construction projects: A scientometric approach. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, p.102086. [6] Atasoy, M., Temel, B.A. and Basaga, H.B., 2024. A study on the use of personal protective equipment among construction workers in Türkiye. Buildings, 14(8), p.2430. [7] Rafindadi, A.D.U., Napiah, M., Othman, I., Alarifi, H., Musa, U. and Muhammad, M., 2022. Significant factors that influence the use and non-use of personal protective equipment (PPE) on construction sites—Supervisors\' perspective. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(3), p.101619. [8] Gómez-de-Gabriel, J.M., Fernández-Madrigal, J.A., del Carmen Rey-Merchán, M. and López-Arquillos, A., 2023. A Safety System based on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) to prevent the misuse of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) in construction. Safety science, 158, p.105995. [9] Yosef, T., Sineshaw, E. and Shifera, N., 2023. Occupational injuries and contributing factors among industry park construction workers in Northwest Ethiopia. Frontiers in public health, 10, p.1060755. [10] Mhando, Y.B., 2021. Factors of inefficient use of personal protective equipment: a survey of construction workers at Arusha urban in Tanzania. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management and Innovation, 4(11), pp.1-11. [11] Al Blooshi, J., Elhadi, R. and Okoh, A.I., 2024. Awareness of the use of personal protective equipment among construction workers. Advances in Biomedical and Health Sciences, 3(1), pp.13-19. [12] Acharya, U.R. and Shrestha, S.K., 2021. Utilization of personal protective equipment in construction industry of Nepal. Advances in Engineering and Technology: An International Journal, 1(1), pp.17-31. [13] Al-Bayati, A.J., Rener, A.T., Listello, M.P. and Mohamed, M., 2023. PPE non-compliance among construction workers: An assessment of contributing factors utilizing fuzzy theory. Journal of safety research, 85, pp.242-253. [14] Aliyi, A.A., Hashim, M.A. and Abdurebi, M.J., 2024. Prevalence of injury and utilization of personal protective equipment among building construction workers and associated factors in Bale and West Arsi Zones, southeast Ethiopia 2022. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, p.1431797. [15] Yankson, I.K., Nsiah-Achampong, N.K., Okyere, P., Afukaar, F., Otupiri, E., Donkor, P., Mock, C. and Owusu-Dabo, E., 2021. On-site personal protective equipment signage and use by road construction workers in Ghana: a comparative study of foreign-and locally-owned companies. BMC public health, 21(1), p.2321. [16] Khoshakhlagh, A.H., Malakoutikhah, M., Park, J., Kodnoueieh, M.D., Boroujeni, Z.R., Bahrami, M. and Ramezani, F., 2024. Assessing personal protective equipment usage and its correlation with knowledge, attitudes, performance, and safety culture among workers in small and medium-sized enterprises. BMC Public Health, 24(1), p.1987. [17] Ahmed, M.I.B., Saraireh, L., Rahman, A., Al-Qarawi, S., Mhran, A., Al-Jalaoud, J., Al-Mudaifer, D., Al-Haidar, F., AlKhulaifi, D., Youldash, M. and Gollapalli, M., 2023. Personal protective equipment detection: A deep-learning-based sustainable approach. Sustainability, 15(18), p.13990. [18] Kursunoglu, N., Onder, S. and Onder, M., 2022. The evaluation of personal protective equipment usage habit of mining employees using structural equation modeling. Safety and health at work, 13(2), pp.180-186. [19] Yipeng, L. and Junwu, W., 2024. Personal protective equipment detection for construction workers: A novel dataset and enhanced YOLOv5 approach. IEEE Access. [20] Alayyannur, P.A., Al Hakim, M.M. and Sari, R.S.R.E.P., 2024. Dermatitis among Workers and Its Relation with Personal Protective Equipment. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 13(2), pp.261-267. [21] Cheng, J.P., Wong, P.K.Y., Luo, H., Wang, M. and Leung, P.H., 2022. Vision-based monitoring of site safety compliance based on worker re-identification and personal protective equipment classification. Automation in Construction, 139, p.104312. [22] Kayastha, R. and Kisi, K., 2024. Assessing Factors Affecting Fall Accidents among Hispanic Construction Workers: Integrating Safety Insights into BIM for Enhanced Life Cycle Management. Buildings, 14(9), p.3017.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Shivam Jha, Nishant Singh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.