Used water management has emerged as a pivotal component in achieving sustainable and resilient urban infrastructure, particularly in the context of India’s rapidly growing cities. With the launch of the Swachh Bharat Mission–Urban (SBM-U) 2.0, the Government of India has intensified efforts to promote effective wastewater management, emphasizing treatment, reuse, and resource recovery as central objectives. This review paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the current practices, technological advancements, and policy frameworks associated with used water management under SBM-U 2.0. The study explores various treatment methodologies including decentralized wastewater treatment systems, faecal sludge treatment plants, and the promotion of non-sewered sanitation solutions, assessing their implementation efficiency across diverse urban settlements. Key challenges such as infrastructure deficits, financial constraints, lack of public awareness, and institutional bottlenecks are critically examined to understand their impact on program success. The paper also evaluates government interventions, private sector participation, and community engagement in strengthening urban sanitation value chains. Furthermore, several case studies from different Indian states are reviewed to highlight best practices, scalable models, and lessons learned in used water recycling and reuse for non-potable applications like landscaping, agriculture, and industrial processes. The findings indicate that while SBM-U 2.0 has laid a strategic foundation for urban wastewater management, the translation of policy into action requires integrated planning, enhanced governance, and capacity-building at all levels. This review concludes by identifying potential areas for innovation and future research, emphasizing the need for a holistic, data-driven, and inclusive approach to achieve the mission’s long-term goals.
Introduction
India faces severe urban water challenges due to rapid urbanization, industrial growth, and population increase, leading to water scarcity and pollution. Efficient wastewater management is critical to protect public health and the environment, yet only about 37% of sewage is treated in India, with many treatment plants underperforming. The Government of India launched the Swachh Bharat Mission-Urban (SBM-U) 2.0 in 2021 to improve wastewater treatment infrastructure, promote scientific and decentralized approaches, and encourage reuse of treated water.
The literature highlights the growing importance of decentralized wastewater treatment systems (DEWATS), especially in peri-urban and rural areas, for their cost-effectiveness and adaptability. Among emerging technologies, Phytorid technology, a constructed wetland system using plants like Iris pseudacorus, shows high efficiency in treating domestic wastewater by natural filtration and microbial processes. It offers an eco-friendly, low-maintenance, and energy-efficient alternative to conventional treatment plants, which often face operational challenges such as power failures and high costs.
While promising, Phytorid systems require further research to optimize performance, scalability, and integration into urban infrastructure. Overall, sustainable wastewater management in India depends on adopting innovative, decentralized solutions aligned with government policies and enhancing enforcement and coordination among stakeholders.
Conclusion
Used water management is a crucial component of urban sanitation, and SBM-U 2.0 has introduced various measures to address wastewater treatment and reuse. While significant progress has been made, challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, financial constraints, and lack of public awareness persist. Future efforts should focus on enhancing technological adoption, policy integration, and community participation to ensure effective and sustainable wastewater management in urban India.
References
[1] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition, American Public Health Association, Washington,1998
[2] Atif Mustafa (2013),” Constructed Wetland for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse:A Case Study of Developing Country”, International Journal of Environmental Science an Development, Vol. 4(1),pp 20-24
[3] Bhardwaj, R. M. (2005). Status of Wastewater Generation and Treatment in India. International Work Session on Water Statistics, Vienna, June 20-22, 2005.
[4] Breitenmoser, L., Cuadrado Quesada, G., Anshuman, N., Bassi, N., Dkhar, N. B., Phukan, M., Kumar, S., Naga Babu, A., Kierstein, A., Campling, P., & Hooijmans, C. M. (2022). Perceived drivers and barriers in the governance of wastewater treatment and reuse in India: Insights from a two-round Delphi study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 182, 106285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106285
[5] Bhalerao, T. et al. (2019). \"Application of Phytorid Technology for Wastewater Treatment in India.\" Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination, 9(4), 411-419.
[6] Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2003-04). Status of Sewage Treatment in India. Government of India.
[7] CPCB, \"Wastewater Management in Urban India,\" 2020.
[8] CPCB (2020). Annual Report on Industrial Wastewater Discharges. Central Pollution Control Board.
[9] CPCB (2021). Report on Wastewater Generation, Treatment, and Disposal in India. Central Pollution Control Board.
[10] Galande, S., Kuwar, G., Jadhal, S., Akhade, P., Rafai, H., & Gurani, K. B. (2022). Phytorid System for Urban Wastewater Treatment. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 8(12), 302. ISSN: 2349-6002.
[11] Harish Uniyal, Trimurti Narayan Pandey, Ujala Mishra and Bharat Phulwari “Effect on Water Quality of Yamuna River Due to Discharge of Open Drains in Delhi”, IRJET, Volume: 06, Issue 02, p-ISSN: 2395-0072, 2019
[12] Kumar, S., & Choudhary, M. P. (2020). Performance Assessment of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plants Operating on Different Technologies. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(3), 1649-1654. ISSN: 2249-8958. DOI: 10.35940/ijeat.C5454.029320.
[13] MoWR (2012). National Water Policy. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
[14] Monzón-Reyes, B.L.; González-Moreno, H.R.; Month, A.E.Á.; Peralta Vega, A.J.; Ballut-Dajud, G.; Sandoval Herazo, L.C. Wastewater Management Strategies in Rural Communities Using Constructed Wetlands: The Role of Community Participation. Earth 2025, 6, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6020018.
[15] Metcalf & Eddy. (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[16] Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F. L., & Stensel, H. D. (2003). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
[17] Kumar, S., & Prasad, R. (2021). \"Agricultural Reuse of Treated Wastewater in India: Challenges and Opportunities.\" Agricultural Water Management, 250, 106825.
[18] Kamble, P. R., Thakre, N., & Lihare, H. (2022). Design of MBBR based sewage treatment plant. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science, 4(5), 3582. Retrieved from www.irjmets.com
[19] Patel, V., & Joshi, A. (2020). \"Advancements in Sewage Treatment Plant Technologies in Indian Cities.\" Water Practice and Technology, 15(2), 320-333.
[20] Priyanka Jamwal, Atul K. Mittal and Jean-Marie Mouchel “Efficiency evaluation of sewage treatment plants with different technologies in Delhi” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0356-9, 2009
[21] R. Kaalipushpa, S. Karthika, S. Revathi, 2017, Domestic Wastewater Treatment using Phytorid Technology, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) ICONNECT – 2017 (Volume 5 – Issue 13)
[22] Saka, T., Ghule, D., Patel, I., Sayyed, S., & Manatkar, P. A. (2021). Phytorid Technology. IJSART - International Journal for Scientific and Advanced Research in Technology, 7(3), 478. ISSN [Online]: 2395-1052.
[23] Sharma Alka, Singhal PK. Impact of floating and emergent vagetation on the trophic status of a trophical lake. The macrophytes and physico-chemical status. J Env Biol. 1988; 9(3):303-311.
[24] Singaram P. Removal of Chromium from tannery effluent by using water weeds. Ind J Environ Health. 1994; 36(3):197-199. 51. Singh DN, Sukumaran PK, Das AK. Periphyton production in a man-made lake. Indian J Fish. 2003; 50(1):41-45.
[25] Suvarna B. Ecological studies on some polluted ponds in Warangal city, A.P. (India). Ph.D, thesis. Kakatiya University, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, 1992. 54. Thangadurai RT, Ravi Mycin M Lenin, Devasena T. Aquatic macrophytes in Veeranam tank, Cuddalore District (India). Int J Curr Sci. 2012; 3:67-71.
[26] Thamke, S. B., & Khan, A. (2020). Constructed Wetlands – Natural Treatment of Wastewater. Nuva College Of Engineering & Technology, Kalmeshwar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
[27] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, \"SBM-U 2.0 Guidelines,\" Government of India, 2021.
[28] NMCG (2020). Assessment of Urban Wastewater Discharge into Ganga Basin. National Mission for Clean Ganga.
[29] Sharma, P., & Singh, R. (2019). \"Empowering Communities for Wastewater Management in Rural India.\" Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109237.
[30] Singh, A., & Rajput, T. (2020). \"Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: An Indian Perspective.\" Environmental Engineering Research, 25(3), 284-296.
[31] Ramakrishnan, S. (2021). \"PPP Models in Wastewater Infrastructure: Lessons from Indian Cities.\" Infrastructure Development Review, 7(1), 45-57.
[32] United States Environmental Protection Agency “National Recommended Water Quality Criteria”,2002.
[33] Werdhani, D., & Karuniasa, M. (2020). Evaluation of sustainable community-based sanitation communal wastewater treatment (Case study of Metro City, Lampung). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 448, 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012070.