Virtual Soldiers for Tactical Training: A Generative AI Framework for Adaptive Military Simulations

Abstract

Traditional military training simulations rely heavily on scripted non-player characters (NPCs) that lack adaptability, limiting realism and tactical unpredictability. This paper proposes a Generative AI (GenAI)-powered framework for virtual soldiers that dynamically adapt tactics, communication styles, and behaviors within VR/AR-based combat environments. The framework integrates multi-modal GenAI capabilities—including vision, speech, and tactical planning—to create avatars capable of dynamic role adaptation as opponents, allies, or civilians. A comparative evaluation is designed to measure realism, adaptability, and training effectiveness against conventional scripted NPCs. By offering cost-effective, immersive, and adaptive combat training, the framework strengthens military preparedness and directly contributes to national security enhancement in an era of increasingly complex warfare.

Introduction

Traditional military training methods like live exercises and scripted digital simulations have significant drawbacks—they are costly, lack realism, and cannot effectively simulate unexpected combat stresses or complex roles (ally, enemy, civilian). Scripted NPCs behave predictably and fail to represent dynamic threats and environments, leading to poor tactical preparedness and preventable battlefield casualties.

Modern warfare is rapidly evolving, featuring drones, cyber warfare, and psychological operations that require soldiers to train for multifaceted, unpredictable threats. To address this, the paper proposes a Generative AI system for virtual soldiers in VR/AR training. This AI integrates multi-modal perception (vision, speech), tactical reasoning, and adaptive communication, allowing avatars to dynamically change roles and behavior in response to evolving combat scenarios, unlike static scripted NPCs.

The study focuses on three key research questions about how Generative AI can enhance realism and adaptability in training, improve tactical decision-making through dynamic role changes, and boost overall training effectiveness and readiness.

Methodology:
The research develops a conceptual framework combining AI theories, multi-modal modeling, and military simulation principles. Core modules include perception (terrain and entity recognition), communication (natural language processing), and decision-making (reinforcement learning for tactical adaptation). The AI-controlled avatars simulate realistic responses to varied combat and civilian scenarios.

Literature Review:
Prior research on AI in simulations, multi-modal models, adaptive learning, and military training is synthesized, highlighting gaps in existing NPC approaches and supporting the need for dynamic, role-adaptive virtual soldiers.

Proposed Framework:
The Generative AI framework features three interoperable modules:

1. Perception Module: Uses multi-sensor inputs to recognize terrain, drones, obstacles, and civilians, feeding data into decision-making.

2. Decision-Making Module: Applies reinforcement learning and tactical planning to adapt avatar actions and roles dynamically (opponent, teammate, civilian).

3. Communication Module: Employs large language models for realistic, military-compliant verbal and non-verbal interactions, simulating human stress responses.

The system operates in a continuous perception-decision-action-feedback loop, allowing avatars to adjust behavior realistically in unpredictable environments, improving training effectiveness, realism, and scalability while reducing reliance on expensive live exercises.

Conclusion

This study presents a Generative AI–powered framework for adaptive virtual soldiers in VR/AR-based military training, addressing the limitations of traditional scripted NPCs. By integrating multi-modal perception, reinforcement learning–based decision-making, and context-aware communication, the model enables avatars to dynamically assume roles as opponents, teammates, or civilians, responding effectively to complex and unpredictable battlefield scenarios. Theoretical analysis demonstrates enhanced training realism, improved tactical decision-making, role adaptability, and scalability for multi-agent deployments. Country-wise cost-benefit projections suggest that, despite initial investments in technical infrastructure and AI development, the framework can deliver significant returns within a few years, reducing reliance on live exercises while improving operational readiness.

References

[1] April, M. D., Stednick, P. J., & Christian, N. B. (2021). A Descriptive Analysis of Notional Casualties Sustained at the Joint Readiness Training Center: Implications for Health Service Support during Large-Scale Combat Operations. Medical Journal, US Army Medical Center of Excellence (MEDCoE). [2] Kotwal, R. S., Montgomery, H. R., Kotwal, B. M., Champion, H. R., Butler, F. K., Mabry, R. L., ... & Holcomb, J. B. (2011). Eliminating preventable death on the battlefield. Archives of surgery, 146(12), 1350-1358. [3] Paul, C., & Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda model. Rand Corporation, 2(7), 1-10. [4] Boulanin, V., Saalman, L., Topychkanov, P., Su, F., & Carlsson, M. P. (2020). Artificial intelligence, strategic stability and nuclear risk. [5] Kumar, N., & Patel, N. M. (2025). Social engineering attack in the era of generative AI. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.66688 [6] Benfatah, M., Elazizi, I., Lamiri, A., Belhaj, H., Saad, E., Marfak, A., ... & Youlyouz-Marfak, I. (2025). AI-assisted prebriefing to enhance simulation readiness in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. [7] Tilak, G. (2024). AI-DRIVEN NPCS AND THE EVOLUTION OF INTERACTIVE STORY TELLING IN VIDEO GAMES. [8] Pei, J., Viola, I., Huang, H., Wang, J., Ahsan, M., Ye, F., ... & Cesar, P. (2024). Autonomous workflow for multimodal fine-grained training assistants towards mixed reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13034. [9] Xie, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, R., Wan, X., & Li, G. (2024). Large multimodal agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15116. [10] Hubin, A., Storvik, G., & Frommlet, F. (2021). Flexible Bayesian nonlinear model configuration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 72, 901-942. [11] Bassey, N. E., Mehdi, Q. H., & Hartley, T. P. (2011, July). Smart Terrain in Online Tactic Agent decision making process. In 2011 16th International Conference on Computer Games (CGAMES) (pp. 143-147). IEEE. [12] Ocaña, M., Luna, A., Jeada, V. Y., Carrillo, H. C., Alvear, F., & Rosales, M. (2023). Are vr and ar really viable in military education?: A position paper. In Developments and Advances in Defense and Security: Proceedings of MICRADS 2022 (pp. 165-177). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Chetan Kasera. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.