Waste and Recycled Material in Concrete Technology

Abstract

The increasing demand for sustainable and eco-friendly construction materials has led to the exploration of alternative materials in concrete production. This research investigates the performance of M50 grade concrete using industrial and agricultural waste materials—Fly Ash, Rice Husk Ash (RHA), and Coconut Shells (CS)—as partial replacements for cement and coarse aggregates. The increasing emphasis on sustainable construction has prompted researchers to explore the incorporation of industrial and agricultural waste materials into concrete. This study investigates the potential of using Fly Ash, Rice Husk Ash (RHA), and Coconut Shells (CS) as partial replacements in high-strength M50 grade concrete. The aim is to evaluate their influence on workability, strength, durability, and density, while reducing dependency on conventional materials. The project involves developing a standard M50 concrete mix and then partially replacing cement with Fly Ash and RHA, and coarse aggregates with Coconut Shells. Each mix was tested for fresh and hardened properties over different curing periods. The experimental work follows IS codes and standard testing protocols to ensure accuracy and consistency. The results indicate that these waste materials can effectively be used in concrete without compromising essential performance characteristics. Depending on the type and percentage of replacement, they also contribute to reduced material cost, improved environmental sustainability, and lower dead load in structural elements. The study underscores the feasibility of using waste-based concrete in both structural and non-structural applications.

Introduction

Concrete is primarily made from cementitious materials, aggregates, and water. Managing waste materials like rubber tires, fly ash, rice husk ash, and coconut shells is critical for sustainable construction and environmental protection. Disposal of waste tires in landfills is banned due to environmental hazards, including contamination and harmful emissions from burning. Recycling concrete rubble reduces landfill use, saves costs, and promotes eco-friendly construction by reusing materials as aggregates or in new concrete (urbanite).

India faces significant challenges due to increasing solid waste production, including industrial byproducts like fly ash, rice husk ash, and demolished concrete. These materials have valuable properties that can replace conventional raw materials in construction, enhancing sustainability and reducing environmental impact.

• Fly Ash is a pozzolanic material from coal combustion, improving concrete durability, workability, and resistance to chemical attacks. India produces ~200 million tons yearly, used in bricks, cement, roads, and soil stabilization.

• Rice Husk Ash (RHA), rich in amorphous silica, is used as cement replacement, bricks, panels, and soil stabilizer. India produces ~24 million tons of rice husk annually, making RHA a valuable resource.

• Coconut Shells serve as lightweight coarse aggregates in concrete, lowering density and enhancing thermal insulation for non-structural applications, reducing costs and environmental impact.

Concrete mix design, especially for high-strength grades like M50, involves careful proportioning of materials including cement, fly ash, aggregates, water, and admixtures to achieve desired strength and durability while incorporating recycled materials for sustainability.

Conclusion

1) Plain m50 concrete exhibited the highest early and 28-day strength, serving as a reliable control benchmark. 2) Fly ash concrete (30% replacement) showed moderate early strength but surpassed the plain mix in long-term strength due to the extended pozzolanic reaction. it is highly recommended for mass concrete works where durability and reduced heat of hydration are desired. 3) Rice husk ash concrete also displayed similar trends to fly ash, with slightly reduced early strength and good long-term performance. its high silica content helps improve concrete density and resistance to chemical attacks. 4) Coconut shell concrete (25% coarse aggregate replacement) resulted in lower compressive strength across all curing durations. however, it remains suitable for non-structural applications where weight reduction and sustainability are more critical than strength. 5) Workability and water demand varied across the mixes. mixes with rha required more water due to the fine particle size, while fly ash improved workability. 6) Environmental impact: the use of industrial by-products like fly ash and agricultural waste like rice husk ash and coconut shells significantly reduces the carbon footprint, supports waste management, and encourages sustainable development in construction.

References

[1] Olanipekun K.A., Olusola K.O., Ata O.; “Comparative Analysis of Concrete Using Crushed Coconut Shell and Palm Kernel Shell as Coarse Aggregates”, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2006. [2] Siti Aminah Bt Tukiman, Sabarudin Bin Mohd; “Use of Coconut Shell and Palm Kernel Shell as Aggregates in Concrete”, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia, 2009. [3] Damodhara Reddy D.V., Sreedhar B., Reddy C. H. V. S.; “Performance of Coconut Shell as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, Vol. 4, No. 4 (2014), pp. 371–375. [4] Ashwini, Gangaiah B. C., Harini M.; “Study on Strength Properties of Coconut Shell Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 5, Issue 4 (2015), pp. 17–20. [5] Nirmal M. Mohan, Apeksha Kanojia; “Environmental Benefits of Coconut Shell Concrete”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Development, 2021 & 2015. [6] Amarnath Yerramala, Ramachandrudu C.; “Properties of Concrete with Coconut Shells and Fly Ash”, International Journal of Engineering Inventions, Vol. 1, Issue 6 (2012), pp. 21–31. [7] Parag S. Kambli, Sandhya R. Mathapati; “Strength Characteristics of Coconut Shell Concrete”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), Vol. 5, Issue 3 (2014), pp. 16–22. [8] Daniel Yaw Osei; “Experimental Assessment on Coconut Shell Aggregate Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, Vol. 2, Issue 5 (2013), pp. 07–11. [9] Dr. R. Kumutha, Vijai K.; “Strength Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2008), pp. 139–147. [10] D. N. Parekh, C. D. Modhera; “Sustainable Concrete Using Recycled Aggregates and Admixtures”, International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2011), pp. 34–40

Copyright

Copyright © 2025 Ms. Hina Ambule , Ms. Nancy Deshbhratar , Ms. Mansi Bahekar , Ms. Pranali Kose , Mr. Amit Katre , Ms. Pallavi Deotale . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.