Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology

Abstract

A major global problem, water scarcity has a negative impact on ecosystems, socioeconomic activity, and millions of people. Effective water resource management calls for well-informed decision-making processes that consider many factors and their respective importance. The goal of this case study is to use the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method to address the problem of ranking water scarcity. The study starts out by developing a set of pertinent standards for evaluating water shortage, including water availability, population demand, storage capacity, total population of the household, accessibility of a nearby source, distance to a perennial source, use of rainwater harvesting, number of animals in the household, water obtained from a public supply, and manual water collection methods. Surveys are used to gather information on these criteria, as well as statistical reports, remote sensing, and expert opinions. To ensure comparability across many parameters, the collected data are subsequently analysed and standardized. The regions are then ranked according to the severity of their water scarcity using a suitable MCDM approach. Using the MCDM method, decision-makers can consider their preferences and opinions as well as give various criteria proportionate weights based on their importance. The case study demonstrates how MCDM was used in the study area\'s battle against water scarcity. Policymakers and stakeholders can utilize the data to identify families that are experiencing the greatest levels of water scarcity and then priorities solutions based on those findings. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis can be performed to assess how well the ranking results hold up under other weightings and criteria. The results of this case study provide a systematic and all-encompassing strategy, which advances water resources management tactics also the results can be further used to prepare a Water Scarcity Zonation Map in ArcGIS or QGIS using RS&GIS method.

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION

The Indian state of Sikkim has consistently struggled with a lack of water. The eastern Himalayan state of Sikkim is renowned for its abundance of natural beauty, including several rivers and lakes. Nevertheless, despite its geographical advantages, the area has long struggled with water shortage issues. Sikkim’s topography is characterized by steep slopes and rough mountains, which makes managing water a challenging undertaking. The area has a primarily monsoon climate, with the heaviest rain falling in the summer. Although the monsoon replenishes water supplies, it is challenging to adequately capture and store water due to the uneven rainfall distribution and the existence of steep terrain. In recent decades, Sikkim has experienced both populations increase and a rise in urbanization. Urbanization and population growth have put stress on water supplies, increasing demand and depleting water supplies. The economic foundation of Sikkim is agriculture. Terrace farming and the production of cash crops demand a significant amount of water. Water supply has also been impacted by the development of hydroelectric facilities in the area since water is diverted for power production. Water scarcity in Sikkim has been made worse by climate change effects including altered rainfall patterns and melting glaciers. Water supply for both human consumption and agricultural use is impacted by these changes. Sikkim’s water shortage is also a result of inadequate infrastructure and water management. The government of Sikkim has started several initiatives to solve water scarcity, including rainwater harvesting projects, reservoir development, and the promotion of water conservation practices. These initiatives seek to increase the state's access to water and promote sustainable water management.

Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) water shortage zonation is a systematic approach that aids in identifying and prioritizing locations with the most difficult water scarcity difficulties.

Water shortage is a serious problem that affects the entire world and is brought on by several factors, including population expansion, climate change, and ineffective water management techniques. It is essential to evaluate and rank regions according to their degree of water scarcity in order to allocate resources efficiently and adopt sustainable water management techniques as water resources grow scarcer. An organized framework for analyzing and contrasting numerous criteria or elements in order to reach conclusions is provided by MCDM technique. This method enables decision-makers to take several aspects of water shortage into account, including availability, quality, population density, agricultural demand, and environmental effects, among others. The government of Sikkim has started several initiatives to solve water scarcity, including rainwater harvesting projects, reservoir development, and the promotion of water conservation practices. These initiatives seek to increase the state's access to water and promote sustainable water management.

II. ADOPTED METHODOLOGY

Following methodology was adopted to conduct the study:

1.  Data collection: By conducting surveys, pertinent data for the study area, such as population data, storage data, qualification data, data on the number of men and women in the population, data on the availability of local sources, information on rainwater harvesting, the amount of water received from public sources, the distance to perennial sources, the number of pet animals, and information on the type of roofing of household were gathered. The MCDM analysis used this data as its input.
2. Criteria Weighting: To reflect each criterion's relative relevance, appropriate weights were assigned to each one. Stakeholder interviews and expert judgement were used to determine the weighting. The weights account for how important each condition is in affecting water scarcity.
3. Suitability Analysis: The Water Scarcity Index or Suitability Index for each location within the research region was calculated using the chosen MCDM technique, Weighted Sum Model (WSM). In order to create a composite score that would represent the degree of water shortage, the standardized data had to be aggregated using the weights that had been assigned.
4. Zonation Mapping: Based on the water shortage index and appropriateness index results, the study region was divided into various zones using QGIS software. A visual representation of regions with various levels of water shortage is provided by the generated zonation map.

III. PROCEDURE

A. Preparation Of Questionnaire For Field Survey

It's crucial to plan questions that capture pertinent data and are in line with the study's objectives when creating a questionnaire for a field survey on water scarcity zonation. The following actions were taken to prepare the questionnaire:

1. Defining the Objectives: The survey's objectives were first distinctly stated. The precise data needed for water scarcity zonation was identified, including factors causing water scarcity, perceptions of water availability, patterns of water use, or community needs related to water resources, as well as the storage capacity of the household and the highest qualification of the household.
2. Finding the Main Themes: The main subjects or themes that the questionnaire will cover were found. Infrastructure, water demand, agricultural methods, socioeconomic factors, water obtained from the public supply, etc. are a few of these. To guarantee a logical flow in the questionnaire, the questions under each category were grouped.
3. Determination of Question kinds: Based on the data that was sought, appropriate question kinds were chosen.
4. Keeping Questions Simple and plain: To prevent ambiguity or confusion, plain and concise language was employed in the questions. The questions were made to be simple enough for the intended audience to grasp.
5. Sequencing Questions Logically: To keep the questionnaire's flow, the questions were arranged in a logical order. To set the stage, broad questions were asked first, and then specific or delicate subjects were introduced gradually.
6. Finalizing the Questionnaire: After making the necessary corrections, the questionnaire was polished and made user-friendly.

B. eld surveys are a crucial technique for gathering first-hand information from the studied area. They entail compiling data through on-site observations, testing, measurements, discussions, and surveys. By conducting firsthand observations, measurements, interviews, and questionnaires inside the subject region, field surveys are an effective way to gather primary data. With the help of this practical approach, researchers can get precise and pertinent data for their research goals.

Field surveys have several advantages over secondary data sources, including the ability to capture unique data that isn't possible with other methods and the ability to collect data that is time- and place-specific. Conducting a field survey requires thorough planning and methodical execution. The essential steps are as follows:

1. Specifying Goals: The specific data needed from the field survey should be specified in the research objectives. This will serve as a direction for gathering data and ensure that the survey is focused on pertinent issues.
2. How to Create Survey Instruments: Create appropriate survey tools, such as interview guides, questionnaires, and observation checklists. The required data must be accurately and effectively captured by these instruments.
3. Sampling Strategy: Select the target population or the areas to be surveyed as part of the sampling strategy. Select a representative sample that is in line with the study's goals while taking statistical significance, accessibility, and diversity into account.
4. Data Collection: Visit the research region to conduct a field survey, collecting data in accordance with the survey's objectives and instruments. Direct observations, measurements, individual or focus group interviews, and the distribution of questionnaires could all be part of this. Keep thorough records of the data gathered to guarantee its accuracy and consistency.

A survey was conducted for a total of 298 households. The name of the house owner and location is not included in the sample data for privacy reasons. The sample data collected is shown in the tables below.

TABLE I

SHOWING THE SAMPLE OF DATA COLLECTED BY CONDUCTING FIELD SURVEY

TABLE II

SHOWING THE SAMPLE OF DATA COLLECTED BY CONDUCTING FIELD SURVEY

C. Criteria Weighting

The prepared questionnaire was circulated among twenty engineers of Sikkim among which eighteen replied and out of eighteen responses only thirteen responses were readable.

TABLE III

SHOWING THE SAMPLE OF QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CRITERIA WEIGHTING

The values obtained from the survey are listed in the table below.

TABLE IV

SHOWING THE RESPONSE OBTAINED FROM THE SURVEY FOR CRITERIA WEIGHTING IS GIVEN IN COLUMN AVG.

D. Water Scarcity Index or Suitability Index

Calculating a water scarcity index using a weighted sum model involves assigning weights to different indicators or criteria related to water scarcity mentioned in table I and table II above and then combining them using a weighted sum formula. Step-by-step process on how to calculate a water scarcity index using this model is given below.

1. Defining the indicators: First, the indicators of water scarcity index were defined as shown in table I and table II. These indicators include total household population, storage capacity, availability of local source, availability of rainwater harvesting system, number of hours water received from public supply, variation between male and female population, type of rooftop of household, highest qualification of household to see the pattern of proper utilization of water.
2. Assigning weights: To each indicator based on their relative importance in contributing to water scarcity. The weights were determined by conducting a survey among the stakeholders and experts as shown in table IV.
3. Calculation of the weighted sum: Each indicator was multiplied by its corresponding weight, and then the products were summed up. The formula for the weighted sum is as follows:

        Weighted Sum = (Weight1 * Indicator1) + (Weight2 * Indicator2) + ... + (Weight N * Indicator N)

4. Interpretation of the index: The resulting weighted sum represents the water scarcity index. The interpretation of the index depends on the scale used for normalization. The indicators were normalized between 0 and 10, the index also ranged between 0 and 10, where higher values indicate higher water scarcity.

TABLE V

SHOWING THE SAMPLE OF SCARCITY INDEX CALCULATION.

TABLE VI

SHOWING THE ABBREVIATIONS USED IN TABLE V

E. Zonation mapping in QGIS

Boundary map was created by digitizing google earth. The kml file obtained from google earth was then converted to shape file in QGIS which was further used in this study. The survey data along with the calculated scarcity index was converted to comma delimited(.CSV) format in MS Excel and saved. The csv file was then imported in QGIS and processed using processing tool. With the use of Vector Geoprocessing tool Plugin, the csv file and shape file were clipped. Categorisation of scarcity zone was done in three parts namely, No scarcity, moderate scarcity and high scarcity according to the values of individual scarcity index of households. The zonation map was then exported to image format from QGIS.

Conclusion

1) By reviewing the result, it was observed that out of 298 households, 86 households fell under no scarcity zone, 42 households under moderate scarcity zone and 196 households under high scarcity zone. 2) It was observed that water scarcity in the study area is mainly because of lack of availability of local sources, less amount of water received from the public supply and less water storage capacity of the households. 3) It was observed during the field survey that proper water management is not done during the distribution of water. 4) It was observed that the study area has a huge potential in Rainwater Harvesting. The government must sensitize the people about the benefits of rainwater harvesting.

References

[1] Chen K, Blong R, Jacobson C (2001) MCE-RISK: integrating multicriteria evaluation and GIS for risk decision-making in natural hazards. Environ Model Softw 16:387–397 [2] Flug M, Seitz HLH, Scott JF (2000) Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 126(5):270–276 [3] Jaiswal RK, Mukherjee S, Krishnamurthy J, Saxena R (2003) Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development – an approach. Int J Remote Sens 24(5):993–1008. [4] Madrucci V, Taioli F, de Araújo CC (2008) Groundwater favorability map using GIS multicriteria data analysis on crystalline terrain, São Paulo State, Brazil. J Hydrol 357:153–173 [5] Shahid S, Nath SK, Roy J (2000) Groundwater potential modeling in a softrock area using a GIS. Int J Remote Sens 21(9):1919–1924 [6] Chowdhury A, Jha MK, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2009) Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. Int J Remote Sens 30(1):231–250 [7] Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184:255–265 [8] Hasan, T.M. (2021) Study on Groundwater Resource Potentiality and Prospect of Artifcial Groundwater Recharge in Barind Tract, Bangladesh: A Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach in GIS Environment, MS Thesis (Unpublished), University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh [9] Sener E, Davraz A, Ozcelik M (2005) An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: a case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeol J 13(5–6):826–834. [10] Dey S (2014) Delineation of ground water prospect zones using remote sensing, GIS techniques—a case study of Baghmundi development block of Puruliya district, West Bengal. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 4(2):62–72 (ISSN: 2277-2081 (online)) [11] Morgan JP, McIntire WG (1959) Quaternary geology of the Bengal Basin, East Pakistan and India. Geol Soc Am Bull 70:319–342 [12] UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1982) Groundwater survey: the hydrogeological conditions of Bangladesh, united nations development programme (UNDP), technical report DP/ UN/BGD-74-009/1, New York, p 113

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Devendra Sharma, Er. Vinod Kumar Sonthwal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.