The growing complexity of modern aviation systems and the increasing demand for real-time situational awareness have accelerated the adoption of optical surveillance technologies in flight operations and ground safety. This review critically examines the evolution, architecture, and applications of camera-based monitoring systems, both onboard and ground-based, enhanced by artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. It explores the integration of smart cameras, infrared sensors, and airborne image recording systems (AIRS) within AI-powered visual analytics pipelines, enabling the automated detection of faults, behavioural monitoring, and prediction of anomalies. Key deep learning models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), YOLO variants, and pose estimation frameworks, are evaluated for their effectiveness in detecting instrument panel alerts, pilot activities, runway intrusions, and UAV threats. This paper further explores the integration of optical data with GPS, IMU, and flight telemetry to facilitate context-aware decision-making and incident reconstruction. Regulatory implications, ethical considerations, and practical deployment challenges are also discussed. By consolidating the current state of research and technological deployment, this review identifies critical gaps. It outlines future directions for advancing optical surveillance systems to ensure safer, more innovative, and more transparent aviation operations.
Introduction
The aviation industry is rapidly advancing toward AI-driven optical surveillance to enhance safety, efficiency, and situational awareness amid growing air traffic and security demands. Traditional radar and radio systems are being supplemented—and sometimes replaced—by camera-based monitoring integrated with deep learning models such as CNNs and YOLO for real-time anomaly detection, pilot behavior analysis, and incident reconstruction. These AI-powered systems are deployed across onboard environments (e.g., cockpit cameras), airport ground surveillance, and global monitoring via satellites and UAVs.
Key technologies include smart cameras with IR and thermal imaging, deep learning for visual analytics, and multimodal data fusion combining video with flight telemetry. Ground systems improve airport security and traffic management, while cockpit monitoring focuses on pilot attention and stress detection. AI enables predictive maintenance and threat detection but faces challenges like regulatory restrictions, data privacy, environmental variability, and model interpretability.
The review systematically categorizes existing literature into onboard, ground, and satellite/UAV systems, analyzing their methodologies, AI models, and operational effectiveness. It highlights major advances such as edge computing for onboard processing and AI frameworks for global airspace monitoring. The study also addresses ethical and legal issues, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to balance safety, privacy, and regulatory compliance.
Conclusion
AI-powered optical surveillance represents a transformative shift in how aviation systems monitor, assess, and respond to operational conditions in real time. This review has presented a comprehensive synthesis of camera-based monitoring technologies, deep learning frameworks, and visual analytics pipelines that are redefining safety and efficiency standards in aviation. From advanced onboard AIRS systems to sophisticated ground-based and satellite-supported visual platforms, the integration of AI has significantly expanded the scope and depth of situational awareness.
Key advancements have been seen in the use of smart cameras [11], multimodal sensors, and deep neural network architectures for tasks such as fault detection, pilot behavior analysis, and anomaly identification. Through detailed comparisons, it is evident that modern architectures, such as YOLOv7 and Transformer-based models, offer superior performance in terms of accuracy, inference speed, dataset adaptability, and edge deployment. These findings reinforce the growing applicability of AI across a diverse range of aviation surveillance contexts.
Nevertheless, critical challenges remain. These include addressing data privacy and regulatory concerns, ensuring model robustness under varying operational conditions, and bridging the gap between academic innovation and real-world implementation. The need for standardized datasets, explainable AI, and privacy-preserving analytics will define the next phase of research.
In conclusion, the convergence of AI and optical surveillance presents a unique opportunity to elevate aviation safety, efficiency, and operational transparency. By aligning technological advancements with regulatory foresight and human-centered design, the aviation industry can develop more intelligent, resilient, and ethically responsible surveillance systems in the years to come.
References
[1] Anjum, K. N., Raju, M. A. H., Saikat, M. H., Avi, S. P., Islam, K. T., Hoque, R., & Imam, T. (2024). Exploring the multifaceted impact of Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things on innovative city management. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 241–248.
[2] Wang, H., Yin, C., Zhang, J., &Gao, H. (2020). An intelligent aviation safety system based on real-time video surveillance and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(12), 5218–5228.
[3] Zhang, X., &Mahadevan, S. (2020). Bayesian neural networks for flight trajectory prediction and safety assessment. Decision Support Systems, 131, 113246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113246
[4] Zhang, X., Qu, X., Xue, H., Tao, D., & Li, T. (2019). Effects of time of day and taxi route complexity on navigation errors: An experimental study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 125, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.019
[5] Ziv, G. (2017). Gaze behavior and visual attention: A review of eye tracking studies in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 26(3–4), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2017.1313096
[6] Harrison, M., Esiri, J., Ezeafulukwe, O., Ekemezie, T., &Digitemie, A. (2024). AI-powered surveillance systems for industrial and urban security applications. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[7] Obiki-Osafiele, A. N., Eziamaka, T. A., &Akinsulire, R. (2024). Predictive threat analysis and drone-enabled surveillance. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[8] Ige, C., Ezeh, C., Nwosu, K., &Ilori, B. (2024). AI-enhanced airport and law enforcement surveillance. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[9] Komolafe, T. S., Ajiga, O. L., &Agu, E. E. (2024). AI Surveillance Systems: Privacy Concerns and Regulatory Gaps. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[10] Kayusi, F., et al. (2025). Future trends in autonomous air traffic management. LatIA, 3, 80. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202580
[11] Ekemezie, T., &Digitemie, A. (2024). AI surveillance in manufacturing safety. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[12] Ahuchogu, O. P., Nwosu, C. I., &Ilori, B. K. (2024). Adaptive learning in surveillance systems. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[13] Akinsulire, R., Ezeafulukwe, O., &Esiri, J. (2024). Model optimization and continuous AI monitoring. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[14] Okatta, J., Agu, E. E., &Efunniyi, C. P. (2024). Federated and ethical AI surveillance practices. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[15] Samira, F., & Harrison, M. (2024). Use of facial recognition and acoustic sensors in urban surveillance. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[16] Lee, D., &Mavris, D. N. (2021). Deep learning-based pilot behavior monitoring for proactive safety management. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 18(9), 574–585.
[17] Esiri, J., &Ezeafulukwe, O. (2024). Cloud-based scaling for AI-powered surveillance systems. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[18] Nwosu, K., Ilori, B., &Ezeh, C. (2024). Optimization and Architecture for AI Surveillance Systems. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[19] LatIA Editorial Board. (2025). Case studies on AI surveillance in aviation. LatIA, 3, 80. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia202580
[20] NASA. (2022). AIRS-WAVE: Airborne Image Recording System – Wide-Angle Video Enhancement (Tech Report). NASA Safety Center.
[21] Phat, T. V., Alam, S., Lilith, N., Tran, P. N., &Binh, N. T. (2021). Deep4Air: A novel deep learning framework for airport airside surveillance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.00806v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00806
[22] Harrison, M., Esiri, J., Ezeafulukwe, O., Ekemezie, T., &Digitemie, A. (2024). AI-powered surveillance systems for industrial and urban security applications. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 031–045.
[23] Kozuba, M., &Pulit, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence systems for supporting video surveillance operators at international airport. Transportation Research Procedia, 74, 1284–1291.
[24] Kundegorski, M. E., Tang, B., Han, J., & Zhang, D. (2022). Optical surveillance for aircraft detection: A review of datasets, algorithms and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.12849v3. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.12849
[25] Majd, D., Rupprecht, C., Shah, M., & Khan, S. H. (2024). Vision-based system for aircraft detection using neural networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 157, 104233.
[26] Appareo Systems. (n.d.). Aircraft flight data recorder – VISION 1000. Appareo. Retrieved from https://www.appareo.com