An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the thermal performance of a tractor diesel engine cooling system using a 50:50 ethylene glycol (EG)–water coolant. The objective was to characterize how cooling parameters vary with engine operating conditions. A tractor engine was coupled to a dynamometer and cooled by a radiator in a closed loop. Temperatures, flow rate, engine speed, exhaust losses, and brake power were measured. Results show that the coolant temperature drop across the radiator remained nearly constant (~3°C) over 1000–2000 rpm. Exhaust heat loss rose nearly linearly with speed (from ?13 kW at 1000 rpm to ?32 kW at 2000 rpm), indicating more waste heat at higher loads. Brake thermal efficiency peaked at about 37.5% around 1400 rpm, then declined at higher speeds, consistent with increased heat and friction losses. Flywheel power reached ?41 kW at 1800 rpm and plateaued. Increasing coolant flow rate elevated the convective heat-transfer coefficient and heat removal rate. In summary, the cooling system-maintained engine temperature effectively, with best performance in the mid-RPM range. The 50:50 EG–water mixture provided adequate heat rejection, but its ~20% lower heat capacity requires slightly higher flow (?15–20%) than pure water.
Introduction
The study addresses the critical need for effective thermal management in agricultural tractor diesel engines, which operate under challenging conditions such as long hours, high ambient temperatures, and dusty environments. Efficient cooling systems are essential to protect the engine, reduce fuel consumption, and extend operational lifespan.
A common coolant used is a 50:50 mixture of ethylene glycol (EG) and water, which balances thermal performance, freeze protection, and corrosion inhibition better than pure water. However, this mixture affects system parameters like flow rate, heat transfer, and radiator design due to its altered physical properties.
The research experimentally evaluates the thermal behavior of a tractor engine cooled by this EG-water mixture across varying engine speeds (1000–2000 RPM). Key measurements included coolant temperature drop, exhaust heat loss, flywheel power output, convective heat transfer coefficient, and engine brake thermal efficiency.
Findings show:
Coolant temperature drop across the radiator remains stable (~2.7–3.5°C) over the tested RPM range.
Thermal power lost through exhaust gases rises steadily with RPM (from ~13 kW to over 32 kW).
Engine brake thermal efficiency peaks around 1400 RPM (~37.5%) and declines at higher speeds.
Flywheel power increases with RPM up to 1800 RPM, then plateaus (~41 kW).
Convective heat transfer coefficient and total heat transfer rate increase linearly with coolant flow rate, improving radiator performance.
Radiator successfully dissipates increasing thermal power proportional to engine speed.
Exhaust gas temperature rises from 455°C to nearly 480°C as RPM increases, highlighting heat load growth.
The results underscore the importance of optimizing cooling system components (coolant type, flow rate, radiator size) and operational parameters (engine speed) to enhance engine reliability, efficiency, and thermal management in agricultural tractors.
Conclusion
This experimental analysis on a tractor diesel engine cooling system using a 50:50 ethylene glycol-water mixture demonstrated the system’s efficiency across a wide RPM range. The results showed that while flywheel power and exhaust heat increase with engine speed, the radiator was capable of maintaining effective thermal performance, with only minor changes in coolant temperature drop.
1) The study verified that brake thermal efficiency peaked at around 1400 RPM, indicating this range as optimal for balancing power output and heat rejection. At this point, the engine operated with the highest efficiency and minimal thermal stress. Additionally, the exhaust gas temperatures and power losses tracked engine RPM closely, which validates the cooling system’s ability to scale with thermal demand.
2) The results showed that as coolant flow rate increased, the convective heat transfer coefficient and the heat transfer rate also increased, confirming that forced convection plays a dominant role in thermal management. This implies that by optimizing pump performance and coolant flow paths, one can significantly improve the cooling efficiency of the system.
3) Furthermore, the study reinforces that despite the slightly lower specific heat of ethylene glycol-based coolants, they are highly effective when used in the correct ratio with water. The additional benefits such as freeze protection, anti-corrosion properties, and higher boiling point make them ideal for harsh agricultural conditions.
In conclusion, this research highlights the importance of cooling system optimization in improving engine durability and performance in tractors. Future scope includes incorporating nanofluid additives, adaptive flow control systems, and CFD-based design tools to further enhance cooling performance under dynamic operating conditions.
References
[1] J. Song, Y. Song, and C. Gu, “Thermodynamic analysis and performance optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) waste heat recovery system for marine diesel engines,” Energy, vol. 82, pp. 976–985, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.108.
[2] H.-R. Siddiqi et al., “Heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of ZnO/DIW based nanofluids in small diameter compact channels: An experimental study,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 39, p. 102441, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102441
[3] F. Incropera, D. DeWitt, T. Bergman, and A. Lavine, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2007.
[4] U. Merkel, M. Schindler, and R. Hauser, “Implementation of EU Stage V Emission Norms for Non-Road Mobile Machinery,” MTZ Worldwide, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 20–27, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s38313-020-0494-2.
[5] F. Ministry of Environment and C. Change, “India Bharat Stage (TREM) V Emission Norms for Agricultural Machinery,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://moef.gov.in/notifications/
[6] M. Binder and G. Wachtmeister, “Technical and regulatory implications of EU Stage V emission legislation for diesel engines,” SAE Technical Paper, vol. 2019, no. 01–0336, 2019, doi: 10.4271/2019-01-0336.
[7] Times of India, “India expected to record its highest-ever annual tractor sales at 10 lakh units in FY 2024-25,” May 2025
[8] “India: Nonroad Diesel Engines,” 2025.
[9] G. Balachandar, “Tractor industry clocks highest-ever domestic sales in FY 23,” The Hindu BusinessLine, Apr. 2023.
[10] Q. Peng et al., “Summary of Turbocharging as a Waste Heat Recovery System for a Variable Altitude Internal Combustion Engine,” ACS Omega, vol. 8, no. 31, pp. 27932–27952, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02818
[11] D. R. Lide et al., “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics Editor-in-Chief.”
[12] S. Fukusako and M. Yamada, “Freezing characteristics of ethylene glycol solution,” Wärme- und Stoffübertragung, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 303–309, Sep. 1989, doi: 10.1007/BF01597235.
[13] S. Devireddy, C. S. R. Mekala, and V. R. Veeredhi, “Improving the cooling performance of automobile radiator with ethylene glycol water based TiO2 nanofluids,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 78, pp. 121–126, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.09.002.
[14] J. A. Eastman, S. U. S. Choi, S. Li, W. Yu, and L. J. Thompson, “Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles,” Appl Phys Lett, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 718–720, Feb. 2001, doi: 10.1063/1.1341218.
[15] Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Liu, K. Yang, and J. Zhang, “Study on Exhaust Heat Recovery Utilizing Organic Rankine Cycle for Diesel Engine at Full-load Conditions,” 2013, pp. 1243–1253. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-33750-5_34.
[16] H. Kiani and A. Ahmadi Nadooshan, “Energy Equipment and Systems Thermal performance enhancement of automobile radiator using water-CuO nanofluid: an experimental study,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://energyequipsys.ut.ac.irwww.energyequipsys.com
[17] H. Sharma, G. Saxena, R. S. Rajput, and R. Randa, “Optimization of Process Parameters of Novel Hybrid Automotive Battery Cooling System using GRA -Taguchi and Heatmap Visualization,” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40032-025-01204-w.
[18] H. Sharma, G. Saxena, R. Randa, and R. S. Rajput, “Novel hybrid vehicle battery cooling system: Integrating Peltier-based heat sinks for control of thermal management,” Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1177/09544062251343501
[19] H. Sharma, P. Kushwah, and G. Saxena, “Review on Nanofluids as Potential Heat Transfer Fluid,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com, vol. 11, pp. 17–28, 2021, doi: 10.9790/9622-1107031728.
[20] N. S. Naveen and P. S. Kishore, “Experimental investigation on heat transfer parameters of an automotive car radiator using graphene/water-ethylene glycol coolant,” J Dispers Sci Technol, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1080/01932691.2020.1840999.
[21] A. Ustaoglu, B. Kursuncu, M. Alptekin, and M. S. Gok, “Performance optimization and parametric evaluation of the cascade vapor compression refrigeration cycle using Taguchi and ANOVA methods,” Appl Therm Eng, vol. 180, p. 115816, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115816.
[22] M. Mia et al., “Effect of time-controlled MQL pulsing on surface roughness in hard turning by statistical analysis and artificial neural network,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 91, no. 9–12, pp. 3211–3223, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9978-1.
[23] S. S. Pungaiah and C. K. Kailasanathan, “Thermal Analysis and Optimization of Nano Coated Radiator Tubes Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Taguchi Method,” Coatings, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 804, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3390/coatings10090804.
[24] A. R. I. Ali and B. Salam, “A review on nanofluid: preparation, stability, thermophysical properties, heat transfer characteristics and application,” Oct. 01, 2020, Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-03427-1
[25] Y. A. Cengel, “Steady versus Transient Heat Transfer 63 Multidimensional Heat Transfer 64 Heat Generation 66.
[26] J. R. Howell, M. P. Menguc, and R. Siegel, Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer. CRC Press, 2015. doi: 10.1201/b18835
.