Concrete is one of the most widely used construction materials due to its high compressive strength, durability, availability, and versatility. However, conventional concrete is relatively weak in tension and is susceptible to cracking and brittle failure. The incorporation of fibers into concrete is an effective approach for improving its crack resistance and mechanical performance. The present study investigates the performance of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete incorporating Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) solution, banana fiber, and sisal fiber. In the present investigation, M25 grade concrete was used as the base concrete. Polyvinyl Alcohol powder was dissolved in water and incorporated into the concrete at a constant dosage of 2.5% by weight of cement. Banana fiber and sisal fiber were incorporated at different volume fractions of 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, and 0.75%. A total of ten concrete mixtures, designated as M0 to M9, were prepared to investigate the individual and combined effects of banana and sisal fibers. The experimental programme included the slump test, compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, water absorption. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of PVA-banana-sisal hybrid fiber reinforced concrete as a promising alternative for improving the mechanical performance of M25 concrete. The use of banana and sisal fibers also provides an opportunity to utilize renewable natural materials in cement-based construction. Further investigations are recommended to evaluate long-term durability, microstructural characteristics, shrinkage and creep behaviour, economic feasibility, and structural-scale applications of the developed hybrid concrete.
Introduction
The text presents an experimental study on Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete (HFRC) using Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), banana fiber, and sisal fiber to improve the mechanical performance of concrete.
1. Background
Concrete is one of the world's most widely used construction materials because of its high compressive strength, durability, versatility, and relatively low cost. However, conventional concrete has low tensile strength and behaves in a brittle manner. Cracking caused by loading, shrinkage, temperature changes, and environmental exposure can reduce its durability and structural performance.
Fiber reinforcement can help overcome these limitations. PVA fibers improve crack control, ductility, and bonding, while banana and sisal fibers provide additional crack-bridging and reinforcement. Combining different fibers can therefore produce a synergistic effect and improve concrete performance.
2. Materials Used
The study used:
OPC 53-grade cement
Natural river sand
Coarse aggregate
Potable water
Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)
Banana fiber
Sisal fiber
Superplasticizer, when required
PVA is a synthetic fiber with good tensile strength, flexibility, and bonding with cement paste. Its hydrophilic nature helps it interact strongly with the cement matrix and control crack propagation.
3. Experimental Programme
The investigation used M25-grade concrete. A conventional concrete mix (M0) was used as the control, while modified mixes contained 2.5% PVA by weight of cement combined with different amounts of banana and/or sisal fiber.
The main combinations were:
M0: No fibers
M1–M3: PVA + banana fiber at 0.25–0.75%
M4–M6: PVA + sisal fiber at 0.25–0.75%
M7–M9: PVA + combinations of banana and sisal fibers at 0.25–0.75%
4. 7-Day Compressive Strength
At 7 days, the average compressive strength ranged approximately from 17.50 to 20.13 MPa.
The highest value was obtained by M8, containing:
2.5% PVA
0.50% banana fiber
0.50% sisal fiber
Its average compressive strength was 20.13 MPa.
The relatively small difference among the three M8 specimens indicates reasonably consistent test results.
5. 28-Day Compressive Strength
The 28-day results showed a clearer improvement from fiber addition.
Mix
Average Strength (MPa)
M0
27.83
M1
28.53
M2
28.77
M3
28.33
M4
28.80
M5
30.43
M6
31.43
M7
32.40
M8
33.67
M9
32.33
The control mix M0 achieved 27.83 MPa, whereas M8 achieved the highest value of 33.67 MPa.
This represents an improvement of approximately 20.98% compared with the control concrete.
6. Reason for Strength Improvement
The improved performance is attributed to the combined action of the three fibers:
PVA fibers improve cohesion between the cementitious matrix and fibers.
Banana fibers help restrict the initiation and growth of micro-cracks.
Sisal fibers provide additional crack bridging and reinforcement.
The combination of fibers helps distribute stresses and restrict crack propagation. performance, while excessive fiber may negatively affect workability and strength. The text also introduces split tensile testing, but
However, the results also show that more fiber does not always mean higher strength. M9, which had higher fiber content than M8, showed a reduction to 32.33 MPa. Excessive fiber can reduce workability, cause poor fiber dispersion, and make compaction more difficult.
Conclusion
The present investigation demonstrates that the incorporation of Polyvinyl Alcohol solution, banana fiber, and sisal fiber can significantly modify the performance of M25 concrete. The experimental results indicate that an appropriate combination of natural fibers is essential for achieving improved mechanical performance.
Among the investigated mixtures, M8 containing 2.5% PVA, 0.50% banana fiber, and 0.50% sisal fiber exhibited the best performance in terms of the measured compressive and split tensile strengths. The 28-day compressive strength increased from 27.83 MPa for M0 to 33.67 MPa for M8, representing an improvement of approximately 20.98%. Similarly, the 28-day split tensile strength increased from 2.75 MPa to 4.03 MPa, corresponding to an improvement of approximately 46.67%.
References
[1] Jatti, K., Vaishnav, P., & Titiksh, A. — Evaluating the Performance of Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete Dosed with Polyvinyl Alcohol, 2016. This is the most directly relevant reference to your topic.
[2] Palanisamy, E. & Ramasamy, M. — Dependency of Sisal and Banana Fiber on Mechanical and Durability Properties of Polypropylene Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Journal of Natural Fibers.
[3] Experimental study on mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete: Effect of cellulose fiber, polyvinyl alcohol fiber and polyolefin fiber, Construction and Building Materials, 2020.
[4] Influence of natural fiber in the mechanical and durability behaviour of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete, Journal of Natural Fibers.
[5] Synergistic fiber hybridization: unlocking superior mechanical performance in cementitious composites, Discover Civil Engineering, 2024.
[6] Comparative study on the mechanical behavior and durability of polypropylene and sisal fiber reinforced concretes, Construction and Building Materials, 2019.
[7] M. Alhozaimy and M. J. Shannag, ?Performance of concretes reinforced with recycled plastic fibers,? Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 293–298, 2009.
[8] shrinkage cracking characteristics of ultra-highperformance fibre reinforced concrete with expansive and shrinkage reducing agents,? Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 65, pp. 248–256, 2013.
[9] K. Sakata, ?A study on moisture diffusion in drying and drying shrinkage of concrete,? Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 216–224, 1983.
[10] I. G. Barr and A. S. A. El-Baden, ?Shrinkage properties of normal and high strength fibre reinforced concrete,? Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2003.
[11] Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia, Drying Shrinkage of Cement and Concrete, C.C.A.A., 2002.
[12] A. Neville, Properties of Concrete, 4th and Final Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
[13] A. M. Tam, V. W. Y. Tam, and K. M. Ng, ?Assessing drying shrinkage and water permeability of reactive powder concrete produced in Hong Kong,? Construction and Building Materials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 79–89, 2012.
[14] G. W. Wash, ?Volume changes of hardened concrete. Significance of tests and properties of concrete and concrete-making materials,? ASTM (STP 169-A), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
[15] M. Grzybowski and S. P. Shah, ?Shrinkage cracking of fiber reinforced concrete,? ACI Materials Journal, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 138–148, 1990.
[16] S. W. Kim, J. J. Park, S. T. Kang, G. S. Ryo, and K. T. Koh, ?Development of ultra high performance cementetious composites (UHPCC) in Korea,? in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Bridge Maintenance (IABMAS \'08), p. 110, Seoul, Republic of Korea, July 2008.
[17] A. Graybeal, ?Flexural behavior of an ultrahighperformance concrete I-girder,? Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 602–610, 2008.
[18] A. Kamen, E. Denarié, H. Sadouki, and E. Brühwiler, ?Thermo-mechanical response of UHPFRC at early age—experimental study and numerical simulation,? Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 822–831, 2008.
[19] A. Chen and C. Fang, ?Contribution of fibers to the properties of EPS lightweight concrete,? Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 671–678, 2009.
[20] Noushini, B. Samali, and K. Vessalas, ?Effect of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibre on dynamic and material properties of fibre reinforced concrete,? Construction and Building Materials, vol. 49, pp. 374–383, 2013.