Wireless sensor networks (WSN) are the promising technology for telecommunication and network industry. It is provided with great potential to solve the number of problems in battlefields and other commercial applications such as traffic surveillance, health controlling, environment monitoring, construction structures, smart homes and offices. Large number of very small size, low cost, low power multifunctional sensor nodes constitute the WSN. These sensors sway the understanding of the physical world by sensing, processing and transmitting the data. The above functions are highly influenced by factors such as power, energy and lifetime of the sensor nodes. This technical paper explores various low power design architectures like reconfigurable hardware, sleep walker, variable dual VDD, modular architecture and folded tree architecture by presenting a comprehensive survey concerning passive and active power control mechanisms in WSN with investigation of the existing solution and evaluation.
Introduction
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are widely used for applications in military, agriculture, biomedical, environmental, and structural monitoring. These systems rely on sensor nodes composed of sensors, microcontrollers, radios, and power supplies—usually batteries. However, radio transmission is energy-intensive, making low-power design critical to extend node lifetime, especially in remote and inaccessible locations.
Key Challenges:
Limited battery life
Infeasibility of frequent replacements
Unreliable renewable sources like wind/solar
Need for efficient, sustainable, and compact designs
Core WSN Node Components:
Sensing Unit
Processing Unit
Transceiver
Storage Unit
Power Unit
Power Generator
Techniques for Reducing Power Consumption:
Duty cycling: Minimize active time
Dynamic frequency/voltage scaling
Radio tuning
Selective functional module activation
Energy-efficient FPGAs (e.g., Xilinx, Altera)
Survey of Low-Power WSN Architectures:
A. SNOC Architecture (Dynamic Voltage Scaling - DVS)
Developed by Robert X. Gao et al
Uses DVS to adjust voltage & clock speed based on task demands
Reduces energy consumption by 43% over fixed-power systems
Uses external oscillator and interrupt-based wakeup
Divides clock into power-level slots
Power modules turned on/off individually to save energy
C. Reconfigurable Hardware Design (FPGA + ICAP)
Developed by Y. Li et al
Uses partial dynamic reconfiguration via ICAP in Xilinx FPGAs
Saves 31–829 mW depending on implementation
Efficient data/control flow through BRAM and UART/ZigBee
D. Modular 3D Cube Architecture
Developed by Rafael et al
Compact, miniaturized 6-module cube structure
Each sub-module handles specific functions (e.g., sensing, power)
Flexible, modular bus-based interconnection using flex PCBs
E. SRAM-FPGA-Based Vision Sensor Node (VSN)
Designed by Muhammad Imran et al
SRAM-based FPGA is more power-efficient than FLASH-based
Enters sleep state with only RTC active after task completion
670 mW average power consumption, ~3.2 years MCU lifespan
F. Near-Threshold Design for Biomedical WSN
Proposed by Jos Hulzink et al
Uses SIMD, multi-layer clock gating, and 15 power domains
Processor and memories can independently switch on/off
Achieves 13 pJ/cycle for single-lead ECG application
G. Variable Dual-VDD Reconfigurable Processor
Developed by Jianfeng Zhu et al
Utilizes dual voltage levels (VDDH, VDDL) selectively for interconnects
Controlled via compiler and buck converter
Achieves 1.2 μW power at 0.7V, highly efficient interconnect-level design
Conclusion
Power consumption is the vital factor to be considered in recent years, many researches are concentrating on low power architectures. Power consumption influences the performance and the lifetime of the sensor nodes in WSN. Various design architectures are surveyed and compared in this technical paper in terms of power and energy consumption. The above surveyed papers present the low power design along with other features such as lifetime enhancement, low area complexity.