This study investigates the comparative seismic performance of a multi-storey residential building constructed with Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (ACC) block infill, analyzed both with and without reinforced cement concrete (RCC) shear walls. ACC blocks, known for their lightweight and thermal efficiency, significantly influence the mass and lateral stiffness of a structure, thereby affecting its seismic response. In this research, a typical multi-storey residential building model is developed and evaluated using standard seismic design provisions.
Introduction
India lies in a seismically active region, making earthquake-resistant design critical for multi-storey residential buildings. Seismic performance refers to a structure’s ability to withstand earthquake-induced forces and minimize damage. Factors affecting seismic response include building height, stiffness, material properties, weight distribution, and architectural design.
Literature Insights:
Shear walls significantly enhance lateral resistance and reduce inter-storey drift in high-rise RCC buildings.
Placement (corner vs. center) and thickness of shear walls affect seismic performance.
Retrofitting buildings without shear walls with bracing systems (X, K, V-bracing) improves earthquake resilience.
Performance-based seismic design (PBSD) is essential for tall buildings to ensure safety, stability, and durability.
Research Objectives:
Ensure structural safety and stability under seismic loads.
Evaluate building performance during earthquakes.
Check durability, economic feasibility, and maintainability.
Compare multi-storey buildings with and without shear walls.
Methodology:
Dynamic analysis is conducted using Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) in ETABS Ultimate 21.1.0.
Two models are created: one without shear walls and one with shear walls.
RSA evaluates a structure’s response across various ground motion frequencies to predict dynamic behavior during earthquakes.
Maximum story drift and displacement in X and Y directions
Torsion, time period, and story stiffness
The study provides a comparative understanding of how shear walls improve seismic resilience, reduce lateral displacement, and enhance the overall structural stability of multi-storey buildings in earthquake-prone regions.
Conclusion
From this study we have so many conclusions which is following:
1) The change in maximum story displacement in x direction is 25-50 mm in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
2) The change in maximum story displacement in y direction is 50-60 mm in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
3) The change in maximum story drift in x direction is 0.01-0.013 in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
4) The change in maximum story drift in y direction is 0.008-0.0113 in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
5) The torsion present in first mode and second mode in without shear wall model while torsion is not present in with shear wall model.
6) The change in maximum story stiffness in x direction is 100000-110000 KN/m in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
7) The change in maximum story stiffness in y direction is 200000-250000 KN/m in compare of with shear wall or without shear wall.
8) The base shear of multistorey building with shear wall in x-direction is 4900 KN/m while. The base shear of multistorey building without shear wall in x-direction is 5400 KN.
9) The base shear of multistorey building with shear wall in y-direction is 5125 KN/m while. The base shear of multistorey building without shear wall in x-direction is 5190 KN.
References
[1] Sarkar, S., & Jain, S. K. (2024). Recent Advances in Seismic Design Parameters for India: Implications for the Bhuj Region. Earthquake Spectra, 35(S1), 367-396.
[2] Das, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Performance-based Seismic Design of Masonry Buildings in Bhuj Region: A Comparative Study. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 17(3), 415-436.
[3] Jain, S. K., & Paul, D. K. (2023). Recent Developments in Seismic Design of Tall Buildings: Lessons Learned from the Bhuj Region. Structural Engineering International, 33(2), 189-204.
[4] Y. Cheng, L. Zhang, and T. Huang, \"Optimal Placement of Shear Walls in Tall Buildings for Enhanced Seismic Performance,\" Engineering Structures, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 129-140, 2018
[5] Mahdi H. Ahmed N. and Abdullah.A.(2018) “Dynamic analysis of multistorey building with openings in shear wall” international journal of emerging trends in engineering and development, issue-8
[6] N. Prakash, (2018), “Analysis of a multi storied building with and without shear wall” International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management (IJREAM) ISSN: 2454-9150, Vol 04, Issue-03.
[7] A. Sarkar, S. Barman, and P. Sen, \"Seismic Behavior of Buildings with Open Ground Floors and Shear Walls,\" Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 159-172, 2016.
[8] S. Das and S. Maity, \"Impact of Shear Wall Openings on Seismic Performance of Multi-Storey Buildings,\" International Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 244-254, 2016.
[9] S. Ghosh, T. Banerjee, and P. Mallick, \"Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Multi-Storey Buildings with and Without Shear Walls,\" Engineering Seismology Review, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 234-247, 2015.
[10] R. Kumar and P. Saha, \"Seismic Retrofitting of Multi-Storey Buildings Using Shear Walls and Dampers,\" Earthquake Engineering Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 135-148, 2015