Set domination is a fundamental concept in graph theory, crucial for understanding and analyzing network structures. In this paper, we extend the notion of set domination to Neutrosophic graphs, which accommodate uncertain and indeterminate information. We introduce the concept of neutrosophic set domination, which aims to identify subsets of vertices in a neutrosophic graph that either dominate the entire graph or are adjacent to dominating vertices. We define neutrosophic domination sets and investigate their properties in neutrosophic graphs. Furthermore, we explore algorithms for computing neutrosophic set domination and discuss their computational complexity. Finally, we provide numerical examples to illustrate the application of neutrosophic set domination in real-world scenarios, demonstrating its effectiveness in analyzing and optimizing uncertain networks.
Introduction
Graph theory studies the relationships between vertices and edges, with applications in mathematics, computer science, IT, biosciences, and linguistics. Fuzzy graphs, introduced by Kauffman and formalized by Yeh and Rosenfeld, generalize classical graphs by associating membership values with vertices and edges. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (Antonassov, 1984) extend fuzzy sets by including both membership and non-membership values. Neutrosophic sets (Smarandache) further generalize this concept by incorporating three independent components—truth, indeterminacy, and falsity—allowing modeling of uncertainty, inconsistency, and imprecision. Single-valued neutrosophic sets simplify these values to the [0,1] interval for practical applications.
A neutrosophic graph is defined by neutrosophic vertex and edge sets, with cardinality measures for vertices and edges. Set domination in neutrosophic graphs studies subsets of vertices (set dominating sets, SD sets) where every vertex or subset is “dominated” by at least one vertex in the set, ensuring connectivity.
Key theoretical results include:
Every neutrosophic connected or Hamiltonian graph has a set dominating set whose complement is also a set-dominating set.
In neutrosophic graphs without isolated vertices, the complement of a minimal SD set is also a SD set.
For neutrosophic graphs with independent SD sets, the graph diameter is bounded (≤ 4).
These results extend classical graph domination concepts into the neutrosophic framework, enabling the analysis of graphs under uncertainty and indeterminacy.
Conclusion
Fuzzy graph and intuitionistic graph techniques fail in situations where there is indeterminacy. The neutrosophic graph performs well in these circumstances. This study develops the concepts of set domination set in a neutrosophic graph. Here, appropriate examples are used to construct the definitions of set dominating sets, minimal SD-sets, independent set dominating sets, and set domination numbers in neutrosophic graphs. Finally, the set dominance set theorems in the neutrosophic graph are derived and Numerical examples solved in MATLAB. Future developments will expand and apply the idea of the set domination set in neutrosophic graphs to real-world problems.
References
[1] Akram, M., Shahzadi, S.: Neutrosophic soft graphs with application. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32(1), 841-858 (2017)
[2] Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, Vol 8, No 3, 338 - 353 (1965)
[3] Kaufmann, A.: Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Sets. Academic Press Inc., Orlando, Florida (1973)
[4] Rosenfeld, A. Fuzzy graphs. In fuzzy sets and their application to cognitive and decision processes.
[5] Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S., Shimura, M. (eds.) pp. 77 - 95. Academic Press, New York (1975)
[6] R. Yeh, S. Bang : Fuzzy relations, Fuzzy graphs and their applications to clustering anal- ysis,Computer Science, Mathematics University of Texas, Austin, Texas U.S.A. (1975) DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-775260-0.50010-4
[7] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy relations, in L.Antonov,Ed., III International School ”Au- tomation” and Scientific Instrumentation”, Varna (1984) 56-57.
[8] Smarandache, F.: Neutrosophic set a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set, Granular computing. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference, pp. 38-42. doi:10.1109/GRC.2006.1635754
[9] Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.Q., Sunderraman, R.: Single-valued neutrosophic sets. Multisspace Multistruct. 4, 410 - 413 (2010)
[10] Smarandache, F.: Neutrosophy: A Unifying Field in Logicsâ??Neutrosophic Logic. Neu- trosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability. American Research Press, Santa Fe (1999)
[11] Florentin Smarandache, W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy., Ilanthenral Kan- dasamy.:Neutrosophic Graphs: A New Dimension to Graph THeory,January 2015, DOI: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1574172.
[12] Muhammad Akram, Saba Siddique.,Bijan Davvaz.: New concepts in neutrosophic graphs with application,J. Appl. Math. Comput. (2017) DOI 10.1007/s12190-017-1106-3
[13] S. Satham Hussain , R. Jahir Hussain ., Florentin Smarandache.: Domination Number in Neutrosophic Soft Graphs, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, Vol. 28, 2019.