The energy efficiency of construction materials plays a pivotal role in achieving sustainable building practices, where both embodied energy and operational performance define their lifecycle impact. This study presents an energy audit of Textile Reinforced Concrete Insulated Panels (TRCIPs), benchmarked against conventional concrete panels (CPs) and brick masonry walls. The thermal performance was evaluated through laboratory measurements of thermal conductivity using a TPS 2500S analyzer, with corresponding R-values and U-values computed to assess operational energy efficiency.
Results indicate that TRCIPs reduce thermal conductivity by 29% compared to CPs, achieving 26–35% higher thermal resistance. Economic appraisal demonstrates that although TRCIPs incur slightly higher initial costs, they achieve payback within 4–6 years under local tariff conditions and generate substantial lifecycle energy cost savings.
This integrated energy economic audit demonstrates that TRCIPs are energy smart, providing a replicable framework for evaluating sustainable walling systems. The results highlight TRCIPs as a viable next generation material for reducing building energy consumption and enhancing economic performance in construction.
Introduction
The construction industry is a major consumer of global energy, responsible for:
~36% of final energy use
~40% of annual CO? emissions
Concrete is widely used, but Portland cement has high embodied energy.
Energy audits help assess both embodied and operational energy of materials.
Wall systems vary in energy performance:
Brick masonry: High embodied energy, poor insulation
Concrete blocks: Moderate energy use, better with insulation
Reinforced concrete panels (CPs): High thermal conductivity and operational energy
EPS sandwich panels: Excellent insulation, but poor recyclability
TRCIPs use textile waste as an insulating core, offering:
Improved ductility and thermal resistance
Reduced embodied energy and operational energy
Few studies focus on the energy performance of textile-reinforced systems, particularly sandwich panels.
???? Methodology
1. Panel Fabrication
Control Panels (CPs): Traditional concrete with wire mesh
TRCIPs: Textile fiber core sandwiched between concrete layers
2. Thermal Testing
Conducted using Thermal Constants Analyzer (TPS 2500S)
Measures thermal conductivity under ISO standards
3. Analysis
R-values (thermal resistance) were computed to assess insulation efficiency
Lower thermal conductivity = better insulation = lower HVAC energy
???? Results Summary
Panel Type
Thickness
Thermal Conductivity (k)
R-value
Textile Block
1"
0.248 BTU/hr•ft•°F
0.34
TRCIP
3"
0.746
0.34
CP (Control Panel)
3"
1.011
0.25
TRCIPs showed 35% higher thermal resistance than CPs of same thickness
Textile core provides excellent insulation, lowering heat transfer
?? Impact: Cooling Energy & Cost Savings
TRCIPs can reduce annual HVAC energy demand by 15–20%
Estimated annual electricity cost savings:
? PKR 18,000 per household
Over 20 years: PKR 360,000 savings (without tariff increases)
? Key Takeaways
TRCIPs effectively reduce operational energy via superior insulation
They offer a sustainable, economically beneficial solution
Textile waste repurposing aligns with circular economy goals
TRCIPs present a viable alternative to conventional concrete panels for energy-efficient buildings
Conclusion
This study evaluated the thermal insulation performance of TRCIPs against conventional CPs using the TPS 2500S analyzer. The findings clearly establish the superior thermal efficiency of TRCIPs, driven by the incorporation of textile waste as a lightweight insulating core material. The findings of the research study are concluded as:
1) The TRCIP exhibited 29.2% lower thermal conductivity than conventional CPs, confirming the potential use of textile waste as a sustainable insulating core.
2) Based on an average household consumption of 2000 kWh/year for cooling, TRCIPs enable savings of approximately PKR 18,000 annually, equivalent to PKR 360,000 over a 20-year building life cycle.
3) In addition to lowering the panel’s weight, the integration of textile waste cores into TRCIPs contributes to sustainability by reducing embodied energy, reusing textile waste, and enhancing thermal efficiency, making them suitable for sustainable construction applications.
These results demonstrate that TRCIPs are not only technically viable but also economically advantageous for sustainable construction applications.
References
[1] Yolcan, O. O. (2023). World energy outlook and state of renewable energy: 10-Year evaluation. Innovation and Green Development, 2(4), 100070.
[2] Min, J., Yan, G., Abed, A. M., Elattar, S., Khadimallah, M. A., Jan, A., & Ali, H. E. (2022). The effect of carbon dioxide emissions on the building energy efficiency. Fuel, 326, 124842.
[3] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. United Nations Environment Programme. https://globalabc.org/resources.
[4] Balaras, C. A., Droutsa, K. G., Dascalaki, E. G., Kontoyiannidis, S., Moro, A., & Bazzan, E. (2019). Urban sustainability audits and ratings of the built environment. Energies, 12(22), 4243.
[5] Asdrubali, F., Grazieschi, G., Roncone, M., Thiebat, F., & Carbonaro, C. (2023). Sustainability of building materials: Embodied energy and embodied carbon of masonry. Energies, 16(4), 1846.
[6] Mahboob, M., Ali, M., Rashid, T. U., & Hassan, R. (2021). Assessment of embodied energy and environmental impact of sustainable building materials and technologies for residential sector. Engineering Proceedings, 12(1), 62.
[7] Gursel, A. P., Shehabi, A., & Horvath, A. (2023). Embodied energy and greenhouse gas emission trends from major construction materials of US office buildings constructed after the mid-1940s. Building and Environment, 234, 110196.
[8] Tushar, Q., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M. A., Navaratnam, S., Giustozzi, F., & Hou, L. (2022). Retrofit of building façade using precast sandwich panel: an integrated thermal and environmental assessment on BIM-based LCA. Buildings, 12(12), 2098.
[9] Tushar, Q., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M. A., Navaratnam, S., Giustozzi, F., & Hou, L. (2022). Retrofit of building façade using precast sandwich panel: an integrated thermal and environmental assessment on BIM-based LCA. Buildings, 12(12), 2098.
[10] Yeo, D., & Gabbai, R. D. (2011). Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy and buildings, 43(8), 2028-2033.
[11] Fernando, P. L. N., Jayasinghe, M. T. R., & Jayasinghe, C. (2017). Structural feasibility of Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) based lightweight concrete sandwich wall panels. Construction and building materials, 139, 45-51.
[12] Huang, X., Ye, R., & Zhao, L. (2025). Research progresses of composites with natural fibers recycled from textiles waste. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 20, 15589250251338265.
[13] Sasi, S., Joseph, P., Haigh, R., Sandanayake, M., Vrcelj, Z., & Yaghoubi, E. (2024). A Review on the Effects of Waste Textile Polymer Fiber on Concrete Strength: Exploring the Key Parameters. Buildings, 14(5), 1486.
[14] Friese, D., Scheurer, M., Hahn, L., Gries, T., & Cherif, C. (2022). Textile reinforcement structures for concrete construction applications––a review. Journal of Composite Materials, 56(26), 4041-4064.
[15] Tran, N. P., Gunasekara, C., Law, D. W., Houshyar, S., Setunge, S., & Cwirzen, A. (2022). Comprehensive review on sustainable fiber reinforced concrete incorporating recycled textile waste. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 11(1), 28-42.
[16] Dharek, M. S., Manjunatha, M., Brijbhushan, S., Vengala, J., & Tangadagi, R. B. (2024). Performance evaluation of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete on engineering properties and life cycle assessment: A sustainable approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 458, 142498.
[17] Vatin, N., & Korniyenko, S. (2022). Energy performance of buildings made of textile-reinforced concrete (TRC) sandwich panels. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 113(5), 11303.
[18] Ali, W., Shahzada, K., Shah, R., Jamshaid, H., & Noor, U. A. (2025, September). Seismic capacity assessment of lightweight precast concrete infill wall panels with textile waste core in reinforced concrete frame structures. In Structures (Vol. 79, p. 109669). Elsevier.
[19] Choi, W., Jang, S. J., & Yun, H. D. (2019). Design properties of insulated precast concrete sandwich panels with composite shear connectors. Composites Part B: Engineering, 157, 36-42.